[2023] KEBPRT 1305 (KLR)

[2023] KEBPRT 1305 (KLR)

The Tribunal held that Section 9(3) of Cap 301 only bars the issuance of a further tenancy notice within the specified period if it is based on matters affected by a previous determination. In this case, the previous determination (BPRT Case No. 13 of 2021) related to a notice to increase rent, while the current...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 1305 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Njino Ngwiri; Respondent: John Wanyange; Respondent: Norman Njuguna; Respondent: Lucy Wangui Chege (Sued as the administrators of the Estate of the late Kariu Nyange)
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E142 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the landlord
Judges
CN Mugambi
Legal Topics
Controlled Tenancy, Termination of Tenancy, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Statutory Notice Requirements
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Controlled Tenancy Termination of Tenancy Jurisdiction of Tribunal Statutory Notice Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Njino Ngwiri

Applicant

John Wanyange

Respondent

Norman Njuguna

Respondent

Lucy Wangui Chege (Sued as the administrators of the Estate of the late Kariu Nyange)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the landlord was barred from issuing a notice to terminate tenancy within twelve months of a previous determination affecting the same premises.
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the landlord's notice to terminate tenancy under Section 9(3) of Cap 301.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that Section 9(3) of Cap 301 only bars the issuance of a further tenancy notice within the specified period if it is based on matters affected by a previous determination. In this case, the previous determination (BPRT Case No. 13 of 2021) related to a notice to increase rent, while the current notice seeks to terminate the tenancy on different grounds (landlord's intention to occupy the premises). Therefore, the current notice is not barred by Section 9(3), and the Tribunal retains jurisdiction to entertain it. The tenant's preliminary objection was found to lack merit and was dismissed with costs to the landlord.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the landlord

Orders

  • The tenant's notice of preliminary objection dated 16.6.2023 is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the landlord.