[2021] KECA 851 (KLR)

[2021] KECA 851 (KLR)

The Court found that the application for stay of execution and proceedings was without merit. The applicants failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal was arguable or that it would be rendered nugatory if the stay was not granted. The Court noted that subsequent proceedings in the High Court had already...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KECA 851 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: NIC Bank Kenya PLC; Applicant: Gathogo t/a Valley Auctioneers; Applicant: Car Max (E.A) Limited; Respondent: William Kipkorir Arusei; Respondent: Empro Electrical & Mechanical Engineers Company Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 12 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
J Karanja
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Asset Financing Disputes, Contempt of Court, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Stay of Execution Asset Financing Disputes Contempt of Court Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NIC Bank Kenya PLC

Applicant

Gathogo t/a Valley Auctioneers

Applicant

Car Max (E.A) Limited

Applicant

William Kipkorir Arusei

Respondent

Empro Electrical & Mechanical Engineers Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to a stay of execution and stay of proceedings pending appeal under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal is arguable and whether it would be rendered nugatory if the stay is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the application for stay of execution and proceedings was without merit. The applicants failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal was arguable or that it would be rendered nugatory if the stay was not granted. The Court noted that subsequent proceedings in the High Court had already addressed the impugned orders, effectively restoring the status quo as at 17th December 2018 regarding possession of the motor vehicle. Furthermore, the lack of action by the parties, including failure to file submissions and the absence of an appeal three years after the orders, indicated a lack of interest and rendered the application academic. The Court exercised its discretion to...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution and stay of proceedings is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.