[2018] KEHC 699 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 699 (KLR)

The court allowed the withdrawal of the application dated 15/11/2018 by the applicant, but in accordance with Order 25 Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, awarded costs to the respondents. The court further found that the cause of action arose in Nairobi and the application ought to have been filed there....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 699 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: NIC Bank PLC; Respondent: William Kipkoriri Arusei; Respondent: Gathogo t/a Valley Auctioneers; Respondent: Empro Electrical & Mechanical Engineers Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 306 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal and Costs
Outcome
application withdrawn with costs to respondents; payment and release order issued
Judges
CA Otieno
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Costs Award, Hire Purchase Dispute, Repossession of Property
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Withdrawal of Application Costs Award Hire Purchase Dispute Repossession of Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

NIC Bank PLC

Applicant

William Kipkoriri Arusei

Respondent

Gathogo t/a Valley Auctioneers

Respondent

Empro Electrical & Mechanical Engineers Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 15/11/2018 should be allowed to be withdrawn and on what terms.
  2. 2 Whether the costs should be awarded to the respondents upon withdrawal of the application.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute over repossession and outstanding hire purchase amount should result in a specific payment and release order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court allowed the withdrawal of the application dated 15/11/2018 by the applicant, but in accordance with Order 25 Rule 2(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, awarded costs to the respondents. The court further found that the cause of action arose in Nairobi and the application ought to have been filed there. Recognizing the outstanding hire purchase balance of Kshs.500,000 and the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, the court ordered the third respondent to pay the outstanding sum to the applicant bank, upon which the repossessed motor vehicle should be released to the third respondent forthwith.

Court Disposition

application withdrawn with costs to respondents; payment and release order issued

Orders

  • The application dated 15/11/2018 is marked as withdrawn.
  • Costs are awarded to the respondents pursuant to Order 25 Rule 2(2).