[2018] KEHC 4512 (KLR)
The court held that the appellant was not entitled to state-funded legal representation at the appellate stage because he did not apply for such representation at the trial stage, did not allege that substantial injustice resulted from lack of representation, and did not demonstrate any impediment to presenting his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4512 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Nichasio Nyaga Gichobi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 44 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for State Funded Legal Representation Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for state-funded legal representation dismissed
- Judges
- LW Gitari
- Legal Topics
- Right to Fair Trial, Legal Representation, State Funded Counsel, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nichasio Nyaga Gichobi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for State Funded Legal Representation Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to state-funded legal representation at the appellate stage under Article 50(2)(h) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether failure to have legal representation at trial or on appeal amounts to substantial injustice warranting state intervention.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the appellant was not entitled to state-funded legal representation at the appellate stage because he did not apply for such representation at the trial stage, did not allege that substantial injustice resulted from lack of representation, and did not demonstrate any impediment to presenting his appeal. The law only mandates state-funded counsel where substantial injustice would otherwise result, which was not established in this case. The application was not grounded in any legal provision and lacked merit. The court emphasized that the absence of legal representation does not, by itself, constitute a miscarriage of justice, and courts are competent to determine cases...
Court Disposition
application for state-funded legal representation dismissed
Orders
- The application for provision of an advocate at state expense is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 44 OF 2017
NICHASIO NYAGA GICHOBI....................................APPELLANT
V E R S U S
REPUBLIC...................................................................RESPONDENT
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 19 of 2015 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Gichugu).
RULING
The appellant Nichasio Nyaga Gichobi was tried and convicted on a charge of Incest contrary to Section 20(1) of theSexual Offences Act. He was sentenced to imprisonment for life. This was before the Senior Resident Magistrate Gichugu Court in Criminal Case No. 19 of 2015. The appellant was dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence and filed this appeal.
The Court gave directions that the appeal proceeds by was of oral submissions. The appellant made an oral application that the court assist him with a lawyer as he has no money and a teacher by name J M at [particulars withheld] Primary School stated that he will push him until he is jailed.
The state through the prosecution counsel stated that it has not heard such an application and so would not oppose it, left the matter to court to decided.
I have considered the application. An accused person has a right to legal representation. Article 50(2)(g) of the Constitution provides:-
“Every accused person has the right to a fair trial which includes the right – to chose and be represented by an advocate and to be informed of this right promptly.”
It is for an accused person to exercise the right by choosing to be represented by an advocate of his own choice. The appellant was not represented in the lower court during the trial. He has not submitted that a miscarriage of Justice was occasioned due to the fact that he had no legal representation.
The law does not provide for the state to give an accused legal representation unless in a situation where the accused alleges that substantial injuries would otherwise result and to be informed of this right promptly. Article 50(2) (h) of the Constitution, provides –
Every accused has a right to fair trial which includes the right –
to have an advocate assigned to the accused person by the state and at the state expense if substantial injustice would otherwise result and to be informed of this right promptly.”
The appellant has been convicted by a court with competent jurisdiction. He did not apply for legal representation before the trial court. He was therefore not apprehensive that substantial injustice would result in the trial. Failure to have an advocate during trial does not mean that justice would not be done. Courts are competent to determine cases even where parties are not represented by advocates as the decision is based on facts and the law. It is for the appellant to present his case for determination by the court. The appellant has not alleged any impediment to presenting his appeal before this court. As such, he is not likely to suffer any prejudice or injustice due to failure to have an advocate. My view is that this application is not made under any provision of the law and no provision of the law allows this court to order the appellant to be provided with an advocate. The application has no legal basis and is without merits. The application is rejected.
Dated and delivered at Kerugoya this 12th day of July 2018.
L. W. GITARI
JUDGE