[2021] KEHC 8041 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8041 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to appeal was made promptly following the delivery of the ruling, and that the applicant had demonstrated a right to appeal under Rule II (3) of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court exercised its discretion to grant...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8041 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Nicholas Anwenyi Siro t/a (Riverside) Continental Resort; Defendant: Finlay Kirui; Defendant: Millenia Multi-Purpose Co-op Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisii
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 264 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
leave to appeal granted
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Advocates Remuneration Order, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Advocates Remuneration Order Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nicholas Anwenyi Siro t/a (Riverside) Continental Resort

Plaintiff

Finlay Kirui

Defendant

Millenia Multi-Purpose Co-op Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the ruling and orders made on 12/2/2020.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave was made within the prescribed time under the Advocates Remuneration Order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to appeal was made promptly following the delivery of the ruling, and that the applicant had demonstrated a right to appeal under Rule II (3) of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The respondent did not oppose the application. The court exercised its discretion to grant leave to appeal, noting that the application was timeous and that the applicant was aggrieved by the ruling. Leave to appeal was therefore granted, with the intended appeal to be filed within 30 days from the date of the ruling.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal granted

Orders

  • Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal is granted to the applicants in terms of Rule II (3) of the Advocates Remuneration Order.
  • The intended appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date of this ruling.