[2014] KEHC 1903 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the criminal proceedings constituted an abuse of process or a violation of his constitutional rights. The evidence presented by the respondents, including the results of police investigations and documentary evidence regarding the ownership of the land...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 1903 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicholas Nzioka Ndambuki alias Willy Kahore Wanjiku; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Senior Principal Magistrate, Mavoko Law Courts
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 39 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Criminal Proceedings
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Succession Disputes, Ownership of Land, Prosecutorial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Nzioka Ndambuki alias Willy Kahore Wanjiku
Applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Senior Principal Magistrate, Mavoko Law Courts
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Criminal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the criminal proceedings against the applicant should be stayed pending determination of the High Court application.
- 2 Whether the prosecution of the applicant constitutes an abuse of process or violation of constitutional rights.
- 3 Whether the dispute over ownership of the land parcel justifies halting the criminal case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the criminal proceedings constituted an abuse of process or a violation of his constitutional rights. The evidence presented by the respondents, including the results of police investigations and documentary evidence regarding the ownership of the land and the applicant's alleged false statements, was not rebutted by the applicant. The court held that the existence of a pending succession cause concerning the same parcel of land does not preclude the prosecution of criminal charges arising from alleged fraudulent conduct. The Director of Public Prosecutions acted within constitutional and statutory powers in preferring charges...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for stay of proceedings is dismissed.
- The applicant shall appear before Mavoko Principal Magistrate’s Court on 21/10/2014 for hearing of his case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
No.406/14/14
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS
MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF PARCEL OF LAND L.R. 1504/7 IR 6458 IN SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1754 OF 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA NAIROBI AND IN CRIMINAL CASE NO, 747 OF 2012 AT MAVOKO LAW COURTS
NICHOLAS NZIOKA NDAMBUKIALIASWILLY KAHORE WANJIKU ….....…..APPLICANT
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS……………...................…........1st RESPONDENT
THE SENIOR PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE, MAVOKO LAW COURTS ....2ND RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
By way of Notice of Motion dated 13th March, 2014, the applicant seeks an order staying proceedings in the Mavoko Principal Magistrate’s Court in Criminal Case No. 747 of2012 pending hearing and determination of Machakos High Court Misc Criminal Application No. 39 of 2014, Nicholas Nzioka Ndambuki alias Willy Kahore Wanjiku versus the Director of Prosecutions and Another.
The application is premised on grounds that the applicant has already filed an application seeking a declaration that his rights have been violated by the prosecution by bringing charges against him in the Criminal Case over Land Parcel No. L.R. 1504/7 IR 6458 which is an asset in Succession Cause No, 1754/2009, Nairobi High Court whereby he has filed a protest against confirmation of the grant. Failure to stay proceedings as prayed will render the application nugatory.
In an affidavit in support of the application, the applicant depones that the prosecution is an infringement of the provisions of Section 157(11) of the Constitutionas the ownership of the property must be determined; in exercise of the powers, the Director of Public Prosecutions shall have regard to the public interest of the administration of justice, the need to prevent and avoid abuse of legal process; it is unconstitutional to use criminal process to bar him from contesting for his right to ownership in the Succession Cause and that his attempt to stay proceedings in the Lower Court on constitutional grounds was rejected.
In response thereto, relying on an affidavit deponed by No. 89036923, Inspector Peter Obonyo the 1st respondent stated that a person claiming ownership of a parcel of land – LR 1504/7 IR 6458 who purported to have acquired it by virtue of Letters of Administration granted on 14th March 2009 invaded land owned by Robert Mbugua Chege. Investigations carried out revealed that the original number of the parcel of land was LR 1504/2/2 that was granted to Beacon Ranch Limited. In 1970, 1st October, the land was transferred to Margaret Wamaitha Humphrey at a purchase price of Kshs. 30,000/=.
Margaret Wamaitha disposed off part of the land but did not sell any of the portions to the applicant. The title to subdivision L.R. 1504/7 is in the possession of the family of Margaret Wamaitha.
The applicant swore a false affidavit alleging that his mother Wanjiku Kahore died in 1976, was buried the following day and no death certificate had been issued. Investigations established that a death No. C/No 285981 in the name of Wanjiku Kahore had allegedly been issued by the Registrar of Births and deaths in Machakos on 9th March, 2012 which was disowned by the District Civil Registrar.The applicant’s real mother Mbeti Kiilu of Kangundo Division, Isinga sub-location was traced alive together with his brother Musau Ndambuki.This resulted into the applicant being charged.
Further, he stated that the duty of the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) isto safeguard public interest and the administration of justice to ensure the legal process is not abused.
The application was canvassed by way of written submissions which I have considered together with annextures to the affidavits.
In his affidavit the applicant claims that his late mother Wanjiku Kahore was a Directorof Beacon Ranch Co. Ltd and she leased the subject land to Margaret Wamaitha. The respondents on the other hand, have demonstrated by way of affidavit evidence that Wanjiku Kahore has never been a Director of Beacon Ltd from the outset. Evidence from the Registrar of Titles show that Land Reference No. 1504/7(original No. IR 6458) was transferred to Margaret Wamaitha Humphrey at a consideration of Kshs. 30,000/= in the year 1970 by Beacon Ranch Ltd.
There is a letter from the District Civil Registry, Machakosdenying having issued a Death Certificate No. 285981 to Wanjiku Kahore. It is not denied that the real name of the applicant’s mother is Mbeti Kiilu.
Investigations were undertaken following a complaint having been lodged with the police. The said investigations culminated into the applicant being charged. The criminal charges preferred against him must be proved by the State.
Indeed Article 157(6) (a) mandates the DPP to prefer charges against any person who is found to have committed an offence.Prior to the numerated charges being preferred against the applicant investigations were carried out. Evidence was collected that resulted into the applicant being arraigned in court.
In his application he argues that the charges are in respect of the same parcel of land, an asset in Succession Cause No. 1754/2009.
The constitution provides for protection of fundamental rights but the rights are limited by law. A person who commits an offence cannot be left scot-free just because he has fundamental rights.The complainants are also seized of the same rights that must be protected. Failure to rebut affidavit evidence adduced by the respondent which was overwhelming calls for hearing of the Criminal Case. In the premises, I find no reason to stay the criminal proceedings in the Lower Court.
In the result, the application is dismissed.
The applicant shall appear before Mavoko Principal Magistrate’s Courton the 21/10/2014for hearing of his case.
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at MACHAKOS this 8TH day of OCTOBER, 2014.
L.N. MUTENDE
JUDGE