[2016] KEHC 7938 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to honor the conditions of his release on bail by not attending court and not communicating his absence due to illness. The applicant only appeared after being arrested on a warrant, supporting the prosecution's argument that he is a flight risk. The court determined that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 7938 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicholas Onyango Kawicho; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 229 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Bond
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Trial, Bond Cancellation, Flight Risk, Medical Grounds for Bail
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Onyango Kawicho
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Bond
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient justification for reinstatement of bond after absconding court attendance.
- 2 Whether the applicant's medical condition warrants release on bail pending trial.
- 3 Whether the applicant poses a flight risk justifying continued remand.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to honor the conditions of his release on bail by not attending court and not communicating his absence due to illness. The applicant only appeared after being arrested on a warrant, supporting the prosecution's argument that he is a flight risk. The court determined that the applicant's claim of inadequate medical care in custody was unsubstantiated, as he had been escorted to Kenyatta National Hospital when necessary. Therefore, the application for reinstatement of bond lacked merit, and the trial court's cancellation of bond was proper.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for reinstatement of bond is dismissed.
- The applicant shall remain in custody pending trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.229 OF 2016
NICHOLAS ONYANGO KAWICHO………………………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………………RESPONDENT
RULING
The Applicant, Nicholas Onyango Kawicho is facing charges of conspiracy to commit a felony contrary to Section 393 of the Penal Code and attempted stealing contrary to Section 268(1) as read with Section 389of the Penal Code. The Applicant pleaded not guilty to the charges. The trial is ongoing before the magistrate’s court. Soon after taking plea, the Applicant was released on bail pending trial. However, due to the fact that the Applicant absconded from court, his bond was cancelled. The Applicant has now made an application before this court seeking to have the bond that was earlier issued to him reinstated. In his application, the Applicant explained that he failed to attend court due to illness. He stated that at the time he was expected to be in court, he was admitted in hospital with a chronic chest infection. He emphasized that he had not deliberately failed to attend court. He was still ailing and required constant medical attention and medication which cannot be provided by the Prison authorities. He therefore urged the court to reinstate his bond so that he may receive proper medical attention.
Ms. Kimiri for the State opposed the application. She submitted that the Applicant absconded from court without any lawful excuse. He did not attend court until he was arrested by the police who were executing a warrant of arrest. She stated that the Applicant was a flight risk and should not be released on bail pending trial. She was of the view that the explanation given by the Applicant for his failure to attend court was an afterthought meant to bolster his application. She was of the view that the Applicant had made no case for this court to reinstate the bond that was cancelled.
This court has carefully considered the arguments made before this court. The main reason why an accused person is released on bail pending trial is on the understanding that he will appear before court during trial. In the present application, it was clear that the Applicant did not honour the condition for his release on bail pending trial. He was supposed to present himself to court without fail during trial. The Applicant explained that he did not attend court because of the medical condition that he was suffering from. This medical condition required hospitalization. The Applicant did not however tell the court why he did not communicate to court and explain his failure to attend court on the scheduled hearing dates. The reason advanced by the Applicant for failing to attend court would have gained sympathy with this court if the Applicant had presented himself before court after hospitalization. That was not the case here. The Applicant did not attend court until he was brought to court on a warrant of arrest issued by the court. It is clear to this court that the argument advanced by the prosecution to the effect that the Applicant is a flight risk is not without merit. The complaint by the Applicant that he has a medical condition that requires specialized medical treatment which cannot be provided for by the Prison authorities is not supported by evidence. The Applicant himself told the court that whenever he required specialized treatment, he has been escorted to Kenyatta National Hospital for treatment. Clearly, his medical condition can be managed while he is in remand custody.
The upshot of the above reason is that the application made by the Applicant lacks merit and is hereby dismissed. He shall remain in custody pending his trial. The trial court properly cancelled the bond that was earlier granted to the Applicant. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 28TH DAY OF JULY 2016
L. KIMARU
JUDGE