Nduku v Republic (Criminal Revision E085 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 5436 (KLR) (24 April 2026) (Ruling)
The trial court's order for DNA testing was lawful, necessary, and not a violation of the applicant's constitutional rights. The evidence sought could not have been procured earlier due to the pregnancy term, and the applicant will have the opportunity to challenge the DNA evidence during trial.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 5436 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nickson Mutiso Nduku; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2026
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E085 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Defilement, DNA Evidence, Fair Trial Rights, Self Incrimination, Revisionary Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nickson Mutiso Nduku
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order for DNA testing violates the applicant's constitutional rights
- 2 Whether the trial court's order for DNA testing amounts to a fishing expedition
- 3 Whether the DNA test is necessary and lawful under Section 36 of the Sexual Offences Act
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court's order for DNA testing was lawful, necessary, and not a violation of the applicant's constitutional rights. The evidence sought could not have been procured earlier due to the pregnancy term, and the applicant will have the opportunity to challenge the DNA evidence during trial.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
- Original file Thika Criminal (S.O.) case No.E001/2025 to be returned to trial court for further hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment