[2021] KEHC 9636 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 9636 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to establish good cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. The applicant did not demonstrate that he was unable to obtain the judgment or proceedings in time, nor did he apply for them. The reason advanced—lack of funds to hire an advocate—was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 9636 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Nixon Tuwei Kiprop; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E009 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
F Gikonyo
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Good Cause Requirement
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Out of Time Good Cause Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nixon Tuwei Kiprop

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has established good cause for failure to file an appeal within the prescribed time.
  2. 2 Whether inability to raise litigation fee to hire an advocate constitutes good cause for delay.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's previous application for retrial affects his claim of inability to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to establish good cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. The applicant did not demonstrate that he was unable to obtain the judgment or proceedings in time, nor did he apply for them. The reason advanced—lack of funds to hire an advocate—was not sufficient, as the applicant could have filed the appeal in person or applied for proceedings at no cost, as evidenced by his ability to file the present applications. Furthermore, the applicant had previously filed another application seeking a retrial, undermining his claim of inability to appeal. The court concluded that the delay was inordinate and inexcusable, amounting to an...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The applications for leave to file appeal out of time are dismissed.