[2021] KEHC 9636 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish good cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. The applicant did not demonstrate that he was unable to obtain the judgment or proceedings in time, nor did he apply for them. The reason advanced—lack of funds to hire an advocate—was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 9636 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Nixon Tuwei Kiprop; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E009 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- F Gikonyo
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Good Cause Requirement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nixon Tuwei Kiprop
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established good cause for failure to file an appeal within the prescribed time.
- 2 Whether inability to raise litigation fee to hire an advocate constitutes good cause for delay.
- 3 Whether the applicant's previous application for retrial affects his claim of inability to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to establish good cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time. The applicant did not demonstrate that he was unable to obtain the judgment or proceedings in time, nor did he apply for them. The reason advanced—lack of funds to hire an advocate—was not sufficient, as the applicant could have filed the appeal in person or applied for proceedings at no cost, as evidenced by his ability to file the present applications. Furthermore, the applicant had previously filed another application seeking a retrial, undermining his claim of inability to appeal. The court concluded that the delay was inordinate and inexcusable, amounting to an...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The applications for leave to file appeal out of time are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAROK
MISC. CR. APPLICATION NO. E009 OF 2020
NIXON TUWEI KIPROP......................................................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC.........................................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
Leave to file appeal out of time
[1] The applicant filed two applications on 20th November, 2020; a Notice of Motion and a Chamber Summons. He also filed a Petition of appeal. From the applications and the affidavit in support, it is clear he is seeking for leave of the court to file appeal out of time. The reasons he has given for not filing appeal in time are: -
i) That, although he was aware that his appeal is already delayed, he was not able to file one, for after conviction and sentence, he was unable to raise litigation fee to hire an advocate.
iii) Nonetheless, he believes that his appeal has high chances of success, so it should be heard and determined.
[2] In his oral submissions in court, he stated that he was sentenced in 2014. At one time, he stated that he has never filed any appeal. At another, he stated that his appeal disappeared and was never called in court. He further stated that he has suffered in prison yet it is the court which delayed his file. He therefore asked the court to allow his application to file appeal out of time.
[3] The prosecution counsel, M/S Torosi opposed the request. She took the view that there has been inordinate delay. Yet, no reason was advanced to explain the delay. She stated that the applicant slept on his rights. According to her, litigation should come to an end. Thus, she urged the court to dismiss the request for enlargement of time.
ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION
[4] According to section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya
“An appeal shall be entered within fourteen days of the date of the order or sentence appealed against: Provided that the court to which the appeal is made may for good cause admit an appeal after the period of fourteen days has elapsed, and shall so admit an appeal if it is satisfied that the failure to enter the appeal within that period has been caused by the inability of the appellant or his advocate to obtain a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and a copy of the record, within a reasonable time of applying to the court therefor.”
[5] Therefore, the applicant must show good cause why he did not file appeal in time. Of central consideration is inability to obtain the judgment and proceedings in time. The applicant has not established that inability to obtain judgement and or proceedings prevented him from filing appeal in time. He did not even state that he so applied for judgment or proceedings. He merely stated that he was not able to raise litigation fee to hire an advocate. Litigation fee to hire an advocate is not the issue here as he would still have applied for proceedings or file appeal in person, and as the case may be, at no cost just as he filed the applications before me.
[6] I do note also that he filed another application, to wit, NAROK HC MISC. CR APPL. NO 41 OF 2018 seeking retrial of the case. He cannot therefore claim now that he was not able to file appeal because he could not raise advocate’s fee.
[7] In the absence of explanation, the delay herein is inordinate and inexcusable. I also think that the applicant is abusing the process of court.
[8] The foregoing suggests one thing; that the applicant has not established good cause why he did not file appeal in time. In the circumstances, I am not persuaded to exercise my discretion in his favour. In the upshot, I dismiss applications for leave to file appeal out of time.
Dated, signed and delivered at Narok through Teams Application this 25th day of January 2021
.......................
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE