[2018] KEELC 1728 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1728 (KLR)

The court found that both parties and their advocates were aware of the scheduled hearing date but failed to attend court without explanation. The court adjourned the matter for 30 minutes to provide an opportunity for attendance, but neither party appeared. Given the suit had remained unheard and undetermined for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1728 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Njagi Kanampiu; Defendant: Kellen Nchunguni Riungu & 3 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 265 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Dismissal for Non Attendance
Outcome
Suit dismissed for non-attendance.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Attendance, Order 12 Rule 1, Case Management, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Non Attendance Order 12 Rule 1 Case Management Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njagi Kanampiu

Plaintiff

Kellen Nchunguni Riungu & 3 Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Ruling on Dismissal for Non Attendance

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for non-attendance by the parties and their advocates.
  2. 2 Whether the parties and their advocates were aware of the hearing date.
  3. 3 Whether any order as to costs should be made.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both parties and their advocates were aware of the scheduled hearing date but failed to attend court without explanation. The court adjourned the matter for 30 minutes to provide an opportunity for attendance, but neither party appeared. Given the suit had remained unheard and undetermined for over seven years, and in line with Order 12 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and judicial policy on timely disposal of cases, the court determined that the suit merited dismissal for want of prosecution. No order as to costs was made.

Court Disposition

Suit dismissed for non-attendance.

Orders

  • The suit is hereby dismissed under Order 12 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  • No order as to costs.