[2020] KEELC 3501 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 3501 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as registered proprietors of the suit properties, had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of orders to delineate and mark the boundaries of the parcels in question. The respondent, having been served, failed to appear or contest the application. The court accepted the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 3501 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Njagi Kanampiu; Defendant: Kellen Nchunguni Riungu; Defendant: Francis Kinegeni Chabari; Defendant: Elosy Kagendo Stephen; Defendant: Joseph Kathenya Kanampiu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 265 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Boundary Ascertainment and Enforcement
Outcome
Application allowed in part; orders for boundary delineation and marking granted.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Boundaries, Contempt of Court, Injunctive Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Land Boundaries Contempt of Court Injunctive Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njagi Kanampiu

Plaintiff

Kellen Nchunguni Riungu

Defendant

Francis Kinegeni Chabari

Defendant

Elosy Kagendo Stephen

Defendant

Joseph Kathenya Kanampiu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Boundary Ascertainment and Enforcement

  1. 1 Whether the court should order the County Surveyor and District Land Registrar to delineate and mark the boundaries of LP NO. Mwimbi/Kiraro/1713 and Mwimbi/Kiraro/1714 pending determination of a contempt application.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's alleged contempt of court justifies the grant of the orders sought.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of implementing the orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as registered proprietors of the suit properties, had demonstrated sufficient grounds for the grant of orders to delineate and mark the boundaries of the parcels in question. The respondent, having been served, failed to appear or contest the application. The court accepted the applicants' evidence that the respondent had interfered with the boundaries in defiance of a subsisting court order, making it necessary to involve the County Surveyor and District Land Registrar to ascertain and mark the boundaries. The court exercised its discretion to grant the orders sought to preserve the subject matter and facilitate enforcement of its previous orders....

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; orders for boundary delineation and marking granted.

Orders

  • The Tharaka Nithi County Surveyor and/or District Land Registrar to visit and delineate and/or ascertain and mark the boundaries for LP NO. Mwimbi/Kiraro/1713 and Mwimbi/Kiraro/1714 under the supervision of O.C.S Chogoria pending the hearing and determination of the contempt application.
  • This order to be served upon the O.C.S. Chogoria Police Station for compliance.