[2019] KEELC 4092 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4092 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants are the registered owners of the suit properties and that the plaintiff's suit challenging their titles had already been dismissed with costs. There was no evidence of an appeal or stay of the judgment. The continued occupation and cultivation by the plaintiff and his brother was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4092 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Njagi Kanampiu; Defendant: Kellen Nchunguni Riungu; Defendant: Francis Kinegeni Chabari; Defendant: Elosy Kagendo Stephen; Defendant: Joseph Kathenya Kanampiu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 265 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Ruling on Injunction Application / Post Judgment Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application allowed. Permanent injunction granted against the plaintiff. Costs to the applicants.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Injunctions, Land Ownership, Trespass, Enforcement of Judgment
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctions Land Ownership Trespass Enforcement of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njagi Kanampiu

Plaintiff

Kellen Nchunguni Riungu

Defendant

Francis Kinegeni Chabari

Defendant

Elosy Kagendo Stephen

Defendant

Joseph Kathenya Kanampiu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Ruling on Injunction Application / Post Judgment Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the 1st and 2nd defendants are entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the plaintiff from entering, cultivating, or interfering with LP Nos. MWIMBI/KIRARO/1713 and MWIMBI/KIRARO/1714.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff and his brother have any legal basis to remain on or interfere with the suit properties after dismissal of the main suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants are the registered owners of the suit properties and that the plaintiff's suit challenging their titles had already been dismissed with costs. There was no evidence of an appeal or stay of the judgment. The continued occupation and cultivation by the plaintiff and his brother was therefore unlawful and without legal basis. The applicants demonstrated that they suffered irreparable harm due to the plaintiff's actions, including environmental degradation. Given the absence of any response from the plaintiff and the urgency of the matter, the court granted the permanent injunction as sought, and directed the police to enforce the order.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Permanent injunction granted against the plaintiff. Costs to the applicants.

Orders

  • A permanent injunction is issued restraining the plaintiff and his agents from entering, cultivating, or interfering with LP Nos. MWIMBI/KIRARO/1713 and MWIMBI/KIRARO/1714.
  • The OCS, Chogoria Police Station, is directed to implement the injunction order.