[2024] KEHC 11049 (KLR)
The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the appellant spent in custody prior to sentencing, contrary to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and established appellate authority. The appellate court, upon the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal, reviewed the lower court record and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 11049 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Nasarino Njeru Njagi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E005 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal on sentence marked as abandoned; sentence reduced by ten months and six days to account for time spent in custody.
- Judges
- LW Gitari
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Time Spent in Custody, Appeal Withdrawal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nasarino Njeru Njagi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed failed to account for the period the appellant spent in custody prior to sentencing.
- 2 Whether the sentence should be reduced to reflect the time spent in pre-trial detention.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the appellant spent in custody prior to sentencing, contrary to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and established appellate authority. The appellate court, upon the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal, reviewed the lower court record and determined the exact periods the appellant was held in custody, totaling ten months and six days. The court held that the sentence imposed must be reduced by this period to comply with statutory and case law requirements. The appeal on sentence was marked as abandoned, but the operative order was made to reduce the sentence accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal on sentence marked as abandoned; sentence reduced by ten months and six days to account for time spent in custody.
Orders
- The sentence imposed on the appellant shall be reduced by ten months and six days to take into account the period spent in custody.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Njagi v Republic (Criminal Appeal E005 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 11049 (KLR) (19 September 2024) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 11049 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Chuka
Criminal Appeal E005 of 2024
LW Gitari, J
September 19, 2024
Between
Nasarino Njeru Njagi
Appellant
and
Republic
Respondent
Judgment
1. The appellant filed this appeal against the conviction and sentence passed against him in the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Chuka Criminal Case No.818/2015 where he was charged with attempted murder contrary to Section 220(b) of the Penal Code and an alternative charge of Assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to Section 251 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence of attempted murder were that on the 10/8/2015 at Rukindu village Karingani Location in Meru South Sub-County with intent, unlawfully attempted to cause the death of Domina Cia Karundu by shooting her with arrows.
2. He pleaded not guilty and a full trial was conducted at the conclusion of which he was found guilty and sentence to serve fifteen years imprisonment.
3. He filed the Petition of Appeal based of four grounds which were challenging the sentence imposed by the learned trial magistrate mainly contending that the sentence was harsh and excessive.
4. The matter came up on 24/6/2024 to confirm filing of submissions by the parties. The appellant informed the court that he wished to withdraw the appeal and urged the court to consider the time that he spent in prison while awaiting trial which the trial magistrate failed to take into account. Thus the appellant abandoned the appeal. The State did not object and urged the court to take into account that period as it was not considered.
5. In view of this development the appeal on sentence is marked as abandoned. Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75 Laws of Kenya) it provided:“333(2) Subject to the provisions of section 38 of the Penal Code every sentence shall be deemed to commence from, and to include the whole of the day of, the date on which it was pronounced, except where otherwise provided in this Code.Provided that where the person sentenced under subsection (1) has, prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.”
6. In the case of Abolfathi Ahamad and Another –v- Republic (2017) eKLR the Court of Appeal stated that the time spent in custody while awaiting trial should be taken into account to reduce the sentence which is ultimately passed on the accused.
7. The court stated that it is not enough to state that the period spent in custody has been considered. It must be shown that the time is taken into account to reduce the sentence imposed. I have perused the record of the lower court. It is evident that the time spent in custody was not considered. From the record, the appellant was arrested on 12/9/2015 and arraigned in court on 15/9/2015. He was granted bail and a surety was approved on 17/9/2015. A period of seven days in custody. He was again remanded on 5/1/2017 and released on 31/3/2017, then 14/3/2018 to 17/10/2018. The period spent in custody was ten (10) months and six days.
8. I order that the sentence imposed on the appellant shall be reduced by ten months and six days to take into account the period spent in custody.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT CHUKA THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024. L.W. GITARIJUDGE