[2024] KECPT 1176 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1176 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant, as guarantor, paid Ksh. 179,429 on behalf of the respondent following her loan default. While the respondent claimed to have made partial repayments, the Tribunal scrutinized the evidence and accepted that certain amounts (Ksh. 11,275, Ksh. 21,630.22, and Ksh. 40,905) were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1176 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Peter Ngungi Njaguara; Respondent: Ann Wanja Ngagi
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E711/735 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed in part
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Loan Guarantees, Sacco Liability, Debt Recovery
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Banking and Finance Loan Guarantees Sacco Liability Debt Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Ngungi Njaguara

Applicant

Ann Wanja Ngagi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is liable to refund the claimant the amount deducted from the claimant's account as a loan guarantor.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has repaid any part of the claimed amount and to what extent.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to costs and interest.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant, as guarantor, paid Ksh. 179,429 on behalf of the respondent following her loan default. While the respondent claimed to have made partial repayments, the Tribunal scrutinized the evidence and accepted that certain amounts (Ksh. 11,275, Ksh. 21,630.22, and Ksh. 40,905) were indeed paid by the respondent to the claimant or through the cooperative society. The Tribunal gave the respondent the benefit of doubt regarding some disputed payments due to lack of reconciliation by the claimant. After deducting these payments from the total sum, the Tribunal determined that Ksh. 105,619 remained outstanding. The Tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to...

Court Disposition

claim allowed in part

Orders

  • The respondent shall refund Ksh. 105,619 to the claimant.
  • The respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the claimant.