[2023] KEHC 27393 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 27393 (KLR)

The court found that the defendant had demonstrated sufficient cause for failing to file its defence and counterclaim within the prescribed period, including lack of service of intention to sue and attempts to resolve the matter amicably. The application was unopposed, and the plaintiffs had not taken any steps to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 27393 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Macharia Njamura; Plaintiff: Consolata Wambura Muturi; Defendant: Azima Credit Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Case 2 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Defence and Counterclaim
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Leave to File Defence, Counterclaim Procedure, Service of Process, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Leave to File Defence Counterclaim Procedure Service of Process Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Macharia Njamura

Plaintiff

Consolata Wambura Muturi

Plaintiff

Azima Credit Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Defence and Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to file its statement of defence and counterclaim after the prescribed period.
  2. 2 Whether the application for leave was served on the plaintiffs and whether they would suffer prejudice if leave is granted.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs have taken any steps to prosecute the suit since its filing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the defendant had demonstrated sufficient cause for failing to file its defence and counterclaim within the prescribed period, including lack of service of intention to sue and attempts to resolve the matter amicably. The application was unopposed, and the plaintiffs had not taken any steps to prosecute the suit since its filing. The court was satisfied that the application was served on the plaintiffs' advocates, who acknowledged receipt. There was no evidence of prejudice to the plaintiffs if leave was granted. The court exercised its discretion to allow the defendant to file its defence and counterclaim, and granted corresponding leave to the plaintiffs to respond....

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The defendant is granted leave to file its statement of defence and counterclaim within 30 days.
  • The plaintiff is granted leave to file reply to defence and defence to counterclaim within 14 days of service.