[2019] KEELC 2716 (KLR)
The court found that both suits concern the same parcels of land (LR Nos. 8121, 8069, and 11756) and involve overlapping parties and issues, including ownership, subdivision, and alleged trespass. Proceeding with the suits separately would risk conflicting decisions and an incomplete appreciation of the parties'...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 2716 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Njeneni Estates Limited; Defendant: Miondwe Company Limited; Defendant: Kimkam Enterprises Limited; Defendant: Francis Ngaruiya Njama; Defendant: George Gitere Kahura; Defendant: Kenneth Kimari Gitere; Defendant: Valley Fresh Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 228 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Consolidation of Suits
- Outcome
- application for consolidation allowed
- Legal Topics
- Consolidation of Suits, Land Ownership Disputes, Injunctive Relief, Eviction Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Njeneni Estates Limited
Plaintiff
Miondwe Company Limited
Defendant
Kimkam Enterprises Limited
Defendant
Francis Ngaruiya Njama
Defendant
George Gitere Kahura
Defendant
Kenneth Kimari Gitere
Defendant
Valley Fresh Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Consolidation of Suits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the two suits should be consolidated given that they relate to the same parcels of land and similar issues.
- 2 Whether consolidation is necessary to avoid conflicting decisions and ensure comprehensive adjudication.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that both suits concern the same parcels of land (LR Nos. 8121, 8069, and 11756) and involve overlapping parties and issues, including ownership, subdivision, and alleged trespass. Proceeding with the suits separately would risk conflicting decisions and an incomplete appreciation of the parties' positions. Consolidation is therefore necessary to ensure a comprehensive and just determination of all issues. The application for consolidation was allowed in the interests of justice, with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
application for consolidation allowed
Orders
- This suit is consolidated with Nakuru HCCC No. 36 of 2018 (formerly Nairobi HCCC No. 275 of 2016).
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
ELC NO 228 OF 2017
NJENENI ESTATES LIMITED...........................PLAINTFF
VERSUS
MIONDWE COMPANY LIMITED.............1st DEFENDANT
KIMKAM ENTERPRISES LIMITED......2ND DEFENDANT
FRANCIS NGARUIYA NJAMA...............3RD DEFENDANT
GEORGE GITERE KAHURA.................4TH DEFENDANT
KENNETH KIMARI GITERE.................5TH DEFENDANT
VALLEY FRESH LIMITED....................6TH DEFENDANT
RULING
(Application for consolidation of two suits; the two suits involving the same parcels of land; application allowed)
1. The application before me is that dated 10 December 2018 filed by the plaintiff. The applicant seeks orders to have this suit consolidated with the suit Nakuru HCCC No. 36 of 2018 (formerly Nairobi HCCC No. 275 of 2016). The applicant avers that the two suits relate to the same property and contain similar issues. None of the parties has opposed the application.
2. I have gone through the pleadings in the two suits. The case Nakuru HCCC No. 36 of 2018, was commenced through a plaint which was filed on 12 July 2016. In the plaint, the applicant averred that it owns several parcels of land identified as LR No. 8121, 8069, and 11756. In the year 1986, these properties were charged to Kenya Planters Co-operative Union Limited (KPCU), named as 1st defendant in the suit. There was default and the parties entered into a moratorium agreement which inter alia allowed the applicant to subdivide and sell portions of the suit properties so as to settle the money owing to KPCU. The applicant pleaded that it did subdivide the suit properties and remitted the proceeds to a firm of advocates appointed by KPCU in addition to making some direct payments to KPCU. The position of the applicant is that it has paid all monies due but that KPCU appointed M/s Regent Auctioneers, named as the 2nd defendant in the said suit, to sell the suit properties. In the suit, the applicant has asked for a permanent injunction to restrain the sale of their properties alongside an order for accounts.
3. The present suit was commenced by the applicant through a plaint which was filed on 31 May 2016 against 4 persons, namely Miondwe Company Limited, Kimkan Enterprises Limited, Francis Ngaruiya Njama, and George Gitere Kahura. The plaint was later amended to accommodate two other parties, namely, Kenneth Kimani Gitere and Valley Fresh Limited. In the amended plaint, the applicant averred that it owns the land parcels LR Nos. 8121, 8069 and 11756. It pleaded that the defendants have trespassed into these parcels of land and have proceeded to cut down trees and coffee. It asked for orders of eviction against them, and a permanent injunction. The defendants in their response to the suit, contended that they purchased portions of the named properties so as to enable the applicant pay its loan with KPCU. They contend that the parcels of land were subdivided and the defendants claim ownership of these portions.
4. It is apparent from the above that the litigation in both suits is over the ownership of the land parcels LR Nos. 8121, 8069 and 11756, and/or their subdivisions. If the two suits are continued independently, there is a risk of there being a conflict of decisions and/or a risk of not appreciating the position of all the parties. It is therefore prudent that the two suits be consolidated and be heard together so that a comprehensive judgment of all the issues, involving all the parties may be made. Given that position, I am persuaded that it is in the interests of justice that this application be allowed. I therefore allow the application and order the consolidation of this case with the suit Nakuru HCCC No. 36 of 2018.
5. I make no orders as to costs.
6. Orders accordingly.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 13th day of June 2019.
JUSTICE MUNYAO SILA
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT AT NAKURU
In presence of : -
Ms. Matu for the applicant.
Court Assistants: Janepher Nelima/Patrick Kemboi.
JUSTICE MUNYAO SILA
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT AT NAKURU