https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2366

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelrc/2026/2366

The Court held that although the compensation assessment and demand were made in 2020, the application was filed in February 2026, far outside the three-year limitation period applicable to employment-related and contract-of-service claims. The claim was therefore statute-barred and the Court lacked jurisdiction to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELRC 2366 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Njenga Mbugua; Respondent: Majid Al Futtaim Hypermarkets Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E092 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application struck out as statute-barred; no order as to costs.
Judges
["AK Nzei"]
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services Compensation Assessment, Limitation Period for Employment Related Claims, Jurisdiction of Court Over Time Barred Claims, Unopposed Application, WIBA Compensation
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Law Workers Compensation Civil Procedure Limitation of Actions Enforcement of Director of Occupational Safety and Health Services Compensation Assessment Limitation Period for Employment Related Claims Jurisdiction of Court Over Time Barred Claims Unopposed Application +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njenga Mbugua

Applicant

Majid Al Futtaim Hypermarkets Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the assessed compensation under WIBA could be adopted as a judgment of the Court
  2. 2 Whether the application was time-barred under the Employment Act limitation period
  3. 3 Whether the Court had jurisdiction to grant orders on a statute-barred claim

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that although the compensation assessment and demand were made in 2020, the application was filed in February 2026, far outside the three-year limitation period applicable to employment-related and contract-of-service claims. The claim was therefore statute-barred and the Court lacked jurisdiction to adopt the assessment as a judgment.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as statute-barred; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 20 February 2026 struck off.
  • No order as to costs.