[2024] KEELC 1510 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 1510 (KLR)

The court held that since the certificate of taxation for Kshs 1,162,020 issued by the taxing officer had not been set aside or altered, and there was no dispute as to the retainer or any reference filed against the taxation, the certificate was final and conclusive as to the amount due. Section 51(2) of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 1510 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Njenga Mwaura & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Urithi Housing Co-operative Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E116 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Advocate's Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs with interest and costs of the application
Judges
MD Mwangi
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Entry of Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Taxation of Costs Certificate of Taxation Entry of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njenga Mwaura & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Urithi Housing Co-operative Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Advocate's Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the court should enter judgment in favour of the Advocate/Applicant for the taxed costs as per the certificate of taxation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the certificate of taxation for Kshs 1,162,020 issued by the taxing officer had not been set aside or altered, and there was no dispute as to the retainer or any reference filed against the taxation, the certificate was final and conclusive as to the amount due. Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act empowers the court to enter judgment for the sum certified in such circumstances. The respondent, having been served, did not oppose the application. Therefore, judgment was entered for the applicant for the taxed sum, with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until payment in full, and the applicant was also awarded the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs with interest and costs of the application

Orders

  • Judgment is entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Kshs 1,162,020 with interest at court rates from the date of this ruling until payment in full.
  • The Advocate/Applicant shall have the costs of this application.