[2022] KEELC 4762 (KLR)
The court found that the 3rd party, Francis Njire Maina, was present in court during the proceedings on May 12, 2022, and had sought an adjournment, which was declined. His attendance demonstrated that he was aware of the proceedings and had been served, making his claim of lack of service untenable. The court held...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 4762 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ruth Gathoni Njenga; Defendant: Geoffrey Njuguna Wanjohi; Defendant: Kahawa West Investment Company Limited; Interested Party: Francis Njire Maina
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 324 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Proceedings and for Leave to File Documents
- Outcome
- Application partially allowed; leave granted to 3rd party to file documents; proceedings not set aside.
- Judges
- EK Wabwoto
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Setting Aside Proceedings, Leave to File Documents
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruth Gathoni Njenga
Plaintiff
Geoffrey Njuguna Wanjohi
Defendant
Kahawa West Investment Company Limited
Defendant
Francis Njire Maina
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Proceedings and for Leave to File Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 3rd party was properly served with court process.
- 2 Whether the proceedings should be set aside for lack of service on the 3rd party.
- 3 Whether the 3rd party should be granted leave to file documents and defend the suit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 3rd party, Francis Njire Maina, was present in court during the proceedings on May 12, 2022, and had sought an adjournment, which was declined. His attendance demonstrated that he was aware of the proceedings and had been served, making his claim of lack of service untenable. The court held that setting aside the proceedings on the basis of non-service would be an abuse of process. However, in the interests of justice and considering that the 3rd party was previously acting in person and has now appointed counsel, the court granted him a final opportunity to file and serve all documents he intends to rely on within 14 days, so that the hearing can proceed as...
Court Disposition
Application partially allowed; leave granted to 3rd party to file documents; proceedings not set aside.
Orders
- The 3rd party is granted leave to file and serve all documents he intends to rely on within 14 days from the date of the ruling.
- The matter shall proceed for hearing of the defence and 3rd party’s case on November 10, 2022 as earlier scheduled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Njenga v Wanjohi & another; Maina (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 324 of 2015) [2022] KEELC 4762 (KLR) (8 September 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 4762 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Environment & Land Case 324 of 2015
E K Wabwoto, J
September 8, 2022
Between
Ruth Gathoni Njenga
Plaintiff
and
Geoffrey Njuguna Wanjohi
1st Defendant
Kahawa West Investment Company Limited
2nd Defendant
and
Francis Njire Maina
Interested Party
Ruling
1. Francis Njire Maina, the 3rd Party herein took out the Notice of Motion dated July 14, 2022 seeking for the following orders: -i.Spent.ii.That this court be pleased to order stay of further proceedings pending the hearing and determination of this application.iii.That this court be pleased to set aside all proceedings relating to this matter and to hear the matter afresh.iv.That there be an order that service was not properly dispensed with due to lack of service on the 3rd party applicant and he be granted an opportunity to defend himself by filing his documents.v.That the 3rd party/applicant be granted an opportunity to file his documents and defend the suit.vi.That the costs of this application be provided for.
2. The application was supported by 13 grounds as detailed in the said application and also by an affidavit sworn by the applicant on July 14, 2022.
3. Pursuant to the court’s directions issued on July 22, 2022, the court directed that the application be served on all parties and the same be canvassed by way of written submissions. The applicant was directed to file his written submissions by August 5, 2022 and all the other parties were expected to comply by filing their written submissions by August 19, 2022. At the time of preparation of this Ruling no response and written submissions had been filed by any of the Respondents herein.
4. I have considered the application, the grounds set out on the face of it, the facts deposed in the affidavit and the written submissions filed by the applicant dated August 3, 2022 and the issues for determination are as follows: -i)Whether the 3rd party was properly served,ii)Whether this court should proceed to set aside the proceedings herein as prayed for by the applicant.iii)What are the appropriate orders to issue.I will make a brief sequential pronouncement on the three issues herein.
5. On whether the 3rd party was properly served herein, I note that prior to the hearing of this suit on May 12, 2022, the Plaintiff filed an application dated June 14, 2022 which application sought for extension of time to apply for issuance of a 3rd party notice beyond 14 days of filing defence and the Application for the 3rd party notice be deemed to have been made within such extended time. From the court record, the said application was allowed by Lady Justice L. Komingoi on April 3, 2019. Subsequently thereafter, the matter came up for pretrial before the Deputy Registrar of this court on October 13, 2021 upon which Ms. Nkatha Advocate was present holding brief for Mr. Gachoka Advocate for the Plaintiff while Ms. Thuo Advocate was present for the 1st and 2nd Defendants and 3rd Party. As per the court record Ms. Thuo informed the court that the 3rd party was the director of the 2nd defendant and had been unwell but needed 30 more days to fully comply and file his documents. A request which was granted by the Deputy Registrar.
6. Subsequently thereafter when the matter was fixed for hearing on May 12, 2022 before me, the record shows that Mr. Gachoka Advocate was present for the plaintiff while Ms. Thuo Advocate was equally present holding brief for Mr. Kimani Kahete Advocate for 1st and 2nd defendant while Mr. Francis Njire Maina, the 3rd party was present in person. The 3rd party informed the court that he had been served with a hearing notice about one and a half weeks ago and he needed more time to prepare so that he could proceed with the hearing. The adjournment was declined. The court subsequently allowed the hearing of the plaintiff’s case to proceed and later granted another date the November 10, 2022 for hearing of the defence and 3rd party’s case.
7. The 3rd party has sought for orders to set aside all proceedings herein on account of not being served. However, the record clearly confirmed that the 3rd Party attended the courts proceedings on May 12, 2022 wherein he even sought for an adjournment. A party who attends court’s proceedings cannot turn around and later say that I was not served. The 3rd party’s contention that he was not served is an afterthought and the same is misplaced. The said position cannot be admitted by this court.
8. On the second issue as to whether the court should proceed to set aside the proceedings herein for the reasons that the 3rd party was not served, having found the 3rd party was able to attend the proceedings of May 12, 2022, it will be an absurdity and an abuse of the court process if the same were to be set aside since for all intends and purpose he was fully aware of the proceedings of this court.
9. In view of the foregoing, the request to set aside all the proceedings herein cannot be granted as prayed. However, for the interests of justice and considering the fact that the 3rd Party was acting in person on May 12, 2022 and now that he has appointed Counsel on record to act for him in the matter, I will grant him a final chance to file all his necessary documents that he intends to rely on during the hearing of his case so as the hearing of his case can proceed smoothly on November 10, 2022 as earlier scheduled.
10. In the end, the application dated July 14, 2022 is disposed of in the following terms: -i.The 3rd party herein is granted leave to file and serve all his documents he intends to rely on during the hearing of his case within 14 days from today.ii.This matter shall proceed for hearing of the defence and 3rd party’s case on November 10, 2022 as earlier scheduled.iii.Each party to bear own costs of the application.
11. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI BY EMAIL THIS8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022. E.K.WABWOTOJUDGE