[2018] KEELC 238 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 238 (KLR)

The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed with delay and the applicant failed to demonstrate that she would suffer substantial loss if the stay was not granted. The plaintiff's evidence of occupation of the suit property was not controverted by the applicant. The court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 238 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Njeri Kiriba; Defendant: Kenya Ihenya Company Ltd
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 205 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
AK Bor
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Ownership Disputes, Bona Fide Purchaser, Delay in Filing, Substantial Loss, Security for Stay
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Ownership Disputes Bona Fide Purchaser Delay in Filing Substantial Loss Security for Stay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njeri Kiriba

Plaintiff

Kenya Ihenya Company Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the defendant/applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant demonstrated substantial loss if the stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay was made without undue delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for stay of execution was filed with delay and the applicant failed to demonstrate that she would suffer substantial loss if the stay was not granted. The plaintiff's evidence of occupation of the suit property was not controverted by the applicant. The court held that the conditions for granting a stay of execution pending appeal, as set out in precedent and the Civil Procedure Rules, were not met. Consequently, the application for stay was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 10/1/2018 for stay of execution is dismissed.
  • Costs of the application are awarded to the plaintiff.