https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/scc/2026/219
Although the adjudicator believed she could determine the matter impartially, prior personal and professional interactions with the claimant’s advocate law firm could reasonably create an appearance of bias; to protect transparency, integrity, and public confidence in the proceedings, she recused herself.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] SCC 219 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: PHYLIS NJERI; Respondent: JACINTA KENDI
- Court
- Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Claim E107090 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Matter / Ruling on Recusal
- Outcome
- Recusal allowed; adjudicator stepped aside from further conduct of the matter.
- Judges
- ["GW Kiamah"]
- Legal Topics
- Recusal, Apparent Bias, Impartiality, Administrative Allocation of Matter
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PHYLIS NJERI
Claimant
JACINTA KENDI
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Matter / Ruling on Recusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator should recuse herself due to prior personal and professional interactions with the claimant’s law firm.
- 2 Whether the circumstances create a reasonable apprehension of bias in the mind of a fair-minded and informed observer.
Ratio Decidendi
Although the adjudicator believed she could determine the matter impartially, prior personal and professional interactions with the claimant’s advocate law firm could reasonably create an appearance of bias; to protect transparency, integrity, and public confidence in the proceedings, she recused herself.
Court Disposition
Recusal allowed; adjudicator stepped aside from further conduct of the matter.
Orders
- The presiding adjudicator recused herself from further conduct of the matter.
- The file shall be placed before the Head of Station on 27/8/2026 for directions on reallocation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
**REPUBLIC OF KENYA** **IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT AT NAIROBI** **CLAIM NO. E107090 OF 2025** **PHYLIS NJERI………………………………..…………………….CLAIMANT** **VERSUS** **JACINTA KENDI…………….…………………………………RESPONDENT** **RULING** 1. This matter comes up for judgment. I have considered the claim, response, and supporting evidence filed before this Court. 2. Upon perusal of the pleadings, it has emerged that I have had previous personal and professional interactions with the claimant’s law firm. The issue arising is whether, in the circumstances, I should continue to preside over the matter or recuse myself to safeguard the integrity of the proceedings. 3. The guiding principle is that justice must not only be done but must manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. Judicial officers are obligated to maintain both actual impartiality and the appearance of impartiality so as to preserve public confidence in the administration of justice. Recusal is therefore appropriate where circumstances exist that may give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias in the mind of a fair-minded and informed observer. 4. While I am satisfied that I am capable of determining this matter impartially, the prior personal and professional interactions with the claimant’s advocate law firm may reasonably give rise to perceived concerns regarding impartiality. The Court must avoid any situation that could undermine confidence in the fairness and independence of the proceedings, regardless of the absence of actual bias. 5. In the interests of transparency and to uphold the integrity of the adjudicative process, it is prudent that I do not continue to handle the matter. The upshot is that I hereby recuse myself from further conduct of this matter. 6. The file shall be placed before the Head of Station on 27/8/2026 for directions on reallocation. **It is so ordered.** **DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI via CTS this 14th Day of August 2026** **** **HON. GLADYS. W. KIAMAH** **RESIDENT MAGISTRATE/ADJUDICATOR**