[2018] KEELC 3356 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3356 (KLR)

The court determined that, although there had been a notice to show cause for want of prosecution, all parties had confirmed that submissions on the main motion were filed. The respondents did not object to the suit proceeding, and the interested party requested the court to consider the application on its merits....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3356 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Njeru Mirani & 2 Others; Respondent: The Attorney General & 4 Others; Interested Party: Andrew Nyaga & 2 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 16 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Suit not dismissed; directions to be taken for judgment date.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Want of Prosecution, Judicial Review Procedure, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Want of Prosecution Judicial Review Procedure Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njeru Mirani & 2 Others

Applicant

The Attorney General & 4 Others

Respondent

Andrew Nyaga & 2 Others

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice require the suit to proceed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, although there had been a notice to show cause for want of prosecution, all parties had confirmed that submissions on the main motion were filed. The respondents did not object to the suit proceeding, and the interested party requested the court to consider the application on its merits. In the interests of justice, the court exercised its discretion not to dismiss the suit, instead directing the parties to attend court for directions and fixing a date for judgment.

Court Disposition

Suit not dismissed; directions to be taken for judgment date.

Orders

  • The suit is not dismissed for want of prosecution.
  • Parties to attend court for directions on 30th July, 2018 when a date for judgment will be fixed.