[2019] KEELC 1725 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1725 (KLR)

The court found that the 1st defendant's annexures 11 to 14, filed together with written submissions, constituted new evidence improperly introduced at the submissions stage. The court held that such documents are inadmissible as parties are not permitted to introduce new evidence after the close of pleadings and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 1725 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Njeru Phillip Njoka; Respondent: Benjamin Collins Mati; Respondent: Gerrad Nyagi Wilson
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 12 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Ruling on Expunging Documents and Directions for Judgment
Outcome
Documents improperly introduced through submissions expunged; directions given for filing submissions and judgment date set.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Land Registration, Limitation of Actions, Expunging Evidence
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Land Registration Limitation of Actions Expunging Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Njeru Phillip Njoka

Applicant

Benjamin Collins Mati

Respondent

Gerrad Nyagi Wilson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Ruling on Expunging Documents and Directions for Judgment

  1. 1 Whether documents annexed by the 1st defendant through submissions constitute inadmissible new evidence.
  2. 2 Whether such documents should be expunged from the record in this and related cases.
  3. 3 Whether parties should be directed to file soft copies of their submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 1st defendant's annexures 11 to 14, filed together with written submissions, constituted new evidence improperly introduced at the submissions stage. The court held that such documents are inadmissible as parties are not permitted to introduce new evidence after the close of pleadings and evidence. Accordingly, the court ordered that these documents be expunged from the record in this case and in related cases where similar documents had been filed. The court further directed all parties to file soft copies of their written submissions within seven days and set a common judgment delivery date for the related matters.

Court Disposition

Documents improperly introduced through submissions expunged; directions given for filing submissions and judgment date set.

Orders

  • Annexures 11 to 14 filed by the 1st defendant through submissions are expunged from the record in this and related cases.
  • Parties are directed to file soft copies of their written submissions within 7 days.