[2012] KEHC 5921 (KLR)
Although the applicant is entitled to judgment in terms of the certificate of costs under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the existence of two pending applications challenging the certificate of taxation and the retainer relationship necessitates a stay of the current application. The court finds it imprudent to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5921 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Njiiri Kanyiri & Thuku Advocates; Respondent: Administrators of the Estate of John Ngugi Kimani – Deceased; Respondent: Paul Njoroge Ngugi; Respondent: James Gitau Ngugi; Respondent: Prisca Nyakairu Ngugi; Respondent: Lucy Wangui Ngugi; Respondent: John Ngugi Waringa
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 364 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment in Terms of Certificate of Costs; Application Stayed Pending Determination of Related Applications
- Outcome
- Application for judgment in terms of certificate of costs stayed.
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Retainer Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Njiiri Kanyiri & Thuku Advocates
Applicant
Administrators of the Estate of John Ngugi Kimani – Deceased
Respondent
Paul Njoroge Ngugi
Respondent
James Gitau Ngugi
Respondent
Prisca Nyakairu Ngugi
Respondent
Lucy Wangui Ngugi
Respondent
John Ngugi Waringa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment in Terms of Certificate of Costs; Application Stayed Pending Determination of Related Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether judgment should be entered in terms of the certificate of costs dated 14th June, 2012.
- 2 Whether the pending applications to set aside the certificate of taxation and the ruling affect the determination of the present application.
- 3 Whether there is a dispute as to retainer between the parties.
Ratio Decidendi
Although the applicant is entitled to judgment in terms of the certificate of costs under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the existence of two pending applications challenging the certificate of taxation and the retainer relationship necessitates a stay of the current application. The court finds it imprudent to rule on the application for judgment until the pending applications are heard and determined, as their outcomes may directly affect the applicant's entitlement to the costs claimed. Accordingly, the delivery of the ruling on the application for judgment is stayed pending the resolution of the related applications.
Court Disposition
Application for judgment in terms of certificate of costs stayed.
Orders
- Delivery of the ruling on the application dated 29th June, 2012 is stayed pending hearing and determination of the two pending applications.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
Miscellaneous Application 364 of 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADVOCATES ACT (REMUNERATION ORDER)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF HIGH COURT SUCCESSION CASE NO. 1830 OF 1999
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN NGUGI KIMANI
NJIIRI KANYIRI & THUKU ADVOCATES ………...………..…APPLICANT
VERSUS
ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN
NGUGI KIMANI –DECEASED……….....……..............….1ST RESPONDENT
PAUL NJOROGE NGUGI…………….……..………..…..2ND RESPONDENT
JAMES GITAU NGUGI………………..…………………...3RD RESPONDENT
PRISCA NYAKAIRU NGUGI……………..……………… 4TH RESPONDENT
LUCY WANGUI NGUGI……………….....……………..…5TH RESPONDENT
JOHN NGUGI WARINGA………………...………………..6TH RESPONDENT
RULING
By this application, the Applicant prays for judgment in terms of the certificate of costs dated 14th June, 2012. It is made by a Notice of Motion dated 29th June, 2012 and taken out under Section 5 (2) of the Advocates Act and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act.
The application is supported by the annexed affidavit sworn on 29th June, 2012 by Bernard Muriuki Kanyiri, Advocate and is based on the grounds that the certificate of taxation was issued against the Respondent on 14th June, 2012 for a sum of Kshs. 13,863,538/=. It is also the Applicant’s contention that the said certificate of taxation has not been challenged, altered or set aside by the court, and that there is no dispute as to the retainer between the Respondents and the Applicant.
At the oral canvassing of the application, Mr. Gatheru appeared for the Applicant but the Respondent’s counsel did not attend. A close scrutiny of the affidavit of service upon the Respondents shows that the Respondents were served on 20th July, 2012, for hearing on 31st July, 2012. Seeing that this was sufficient time for the Respondents to attend court, but they did not do so, the court proceeded ex parte.
Mr. Gatheru told the court that the application was for judgment in terms of the certificate of costs and asked the court to grant the order as prayed.
I note that the application is premised on Section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act.Under that provision of the law, the certificate of the taxing officer by whom any bill has been taxed is final as to the amount of the costs covered thereby, unless it is set aside or altered by the court. However, I also note from the court file that there are two pending applications whose outcome might affect this application. The first one is an application by Paul Njoroge Ngugi, the 2nd Respondent, brought by Chamber Summons dated 18th June, 2012 seeking the ruling and order of the Taxing Officer to be set aside. It has been given a date for hearing on 26/9/2012. The 2nd application is brought by the 4th, 5th and 6th Respondents by way of a Chamber Summons dated 20th June, 2012. It seeks orders to set aside both the ruling made by the Deputy Registrar on 6th June, 2012 and the certificate of taxation issued on 11th June, 2012. It further seeks an order that there was no retainer between the Applicants and the Respondents. It is scheduled for hearing on 3rd October, 2012.
Against that background, I don’t find it prudent to give a ruling in the application dated 29th June, 2012. The delivery of the said ruling is accordingly stayed pending the hearing and determination of the aforesaid 2 applications.
DATEDand DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 1st day of October, 2012.
L.NJAGI
JUDGE