[2023] KECPT 852 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 852 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the application dated 6.3.2023 was not prosecuted due to the non-attendance of the applicant. In accordance with procedural law and the Tribunal's inherent powers, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution and non-attendance. The Tribunal further held that the garnishee, having...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 852 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samuel Kabechu Njiri; Respondent: Pan African Staff Society Limited (alias Sanlam Sacco Society Limited); Respondent: Cooperative Bank of Kenya
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 277 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Application / Ruling on Application for Garnishee Orders and Costs
Outcome
Application dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution; costs awarded to garnishee.
Judges
BM Kimemia, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Garnishee Proceedings, Costs Award, Dismissal for Non Attendance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Garnishee Proceedings Costs Award Dismissal for Non Attendance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Kabechu Njiri

Applicant

Pan African Staff Society Limited (alias Sanlam Sacco Society Limited)

Respondent

Cooperative Bank of Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Application / Ruling on Application for Garnishee Orders and Costs

  1. 1 Whether the application dated 6.3.2023 should be dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether the garnishee is entitled to costs and the quantum thereof.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the application dated 6.3.2023 was not prosecuted due to the non-attendance of the applicant. In accordance with procedural law and the Tribunal's inherent powers, the application was dismissed for want of prosecution and non-attendance. The Tribunal further held that the garnishee, having participated in the proceedings and incurred costs, was entitled to reimbursement. However, the Tribunal exercised its discretion to assess the costs at Kshs. 15,000, rather than the Kshs. 30,000 sought, and ordered the applicant/judgment creditor to pay this amount to the garnishee.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution; costs awarded to garnishee.

Orders

  • The application dated 6.3.2023 is dismissed for non-attendance and want of prosecution with costs to be paid to the garnishee by the judgment creditor.
  • Costs of the garnishee assessed at Kshs. 15,000 to be paid by the claimant/judgment creditor.