[2023] KEHC 19808 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 19808 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had been convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty for the offence of stealing under sections 268 and 275 of the Penal Code. The sentence of a fine of Kshs 10,000 or three months imprisonment was lawfully imposed by the trial court. The applicant served the sentence and was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 19808 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amos Kinara Njogu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E088 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Revision file closed as applicant had served sentence and was released; no further orders necessary.
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Stealing Offence, Plea of Guilty, Sentencing, Penal Code Section 268, Penal Code Section 275
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Stealing Offence Plea of Guilty Sentencing Penal Code Section 268 Penal Code Section 275

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amos Kinara Njogu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was properly convicted on his own plea of guilty for the offence of stealing.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was lawfully executed and completed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had been convicted on his own unequivocal plea of guilty for the offence of stealing under sections 268 and 275 of the Penal Code. The sentence of a fine of Kshs 10,000 or three months imprisonment was lawfully imposed by the trial court. The applicant served the sentence and was released from prison on June 3, 2023, as confirmed by the County Probation Director. There being no outstanding issue for determination, the court directed that the revision file be closed as the matter was now spent.

Court Disposition

Revision file closed as applicant had served sentence and was released; no further orders necessary.

Orders

  • This Revision file be closed.