[2025] KEHC 7742 (KLR)
The High Court determined that it lacks jurisdiction to directly reassess a bill of costs taxed by the Deputy Registrar acting as taxing master. The proper procedure, upon a party's objection to the assessment, is for the High Court to consider the reference and, if merited, refer the matter back to a different...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7742 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Ireri Njoka; Respondent: Nicholus Njue Ngoroi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E079 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Reassess Bill of Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; matter referred back to a different taxing master for reassessment of the bill of costs.
- Judges
- RM Mwongo
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Party to Party Costs, Reference to High Court
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Ireri Njoka
Applicant
Nicholus Njue Ngoroi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application to Reassess Bill of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can reassess the bill of costs taxed by the Deputy Registrar.
- 2 Whether the application for reassessment of the bill of costs has merit.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that it lacks jurisdiction to directly reassess a bill of costs taxed by the Deputy Registrar acting as taxing master. The proper procedure, upon a party's objection to the assessment, is for the High Court to consider the reference and, if merited, refer the matter back to a different taxing master for reassessment. Since both parties were amenable to a fresh taxation before another taxing master, and the applicant's grievance centered on the lack of reasons and alleged excessiveness of the taxed amount, the court found it appropriate to refer the bill of costs dated 4th June 2024 back to a different taxing master for reassessment.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; matter referred back to a different taxing master for reassessment of the bill of costs.
Orders
- The bill of costs dated 04th June 2024 is referred back to a different taxing master for reassessment.
- Each party to be heard before the new taxing master.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Njoka v Ngoroi (Miscellaneous Civil Application E079 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 7742 (KLR) (4 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7742 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Embu
Miscellaneous Civil Application E079 of 2024
RM Mwongo, J
June 4, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF TAXATION OF THE PARTY-TO-PARTY BILL OF COSTS IN EMBU HCCA NO. E017 OF 2024
Between
Charles Ireri Njoka
Applicant
and
Nicholus Njue Ngoroi
Respondent
Ruling
1. The applicant filed chamber summons dated 17th October 2024 seeking the following orders:1. Spent;2. Spent;3. That the Honourable Court be pleased to reassess the respondent’s bill of costs dated 04th June 2024; and4. That costs of this application be awarded to the applicant.
2. The application was supported by the grounds set out on its face and facts deposed in the supporting affidavit. These facts are that the taxing master failed to give reasons for her decision. Thus, the assessment is excessive and reassessment is necessary. The applicant stated that he opposed the bill of costs through a replying affidavit but the taxing master assessed it at Kshs 35,800/-. Following taxation of the bill of costs, he wrote a notice of objection to the taxing master on 09th September 2024 seeking reasons for her decision. He said that it is necessary that the bill of costs be reassessed.
Grounds of Opposition. 3. The respondent herein filed grounds of opposition to the application in which he referred to the notice of objection to the bill of costs. He stated that he is agreeable to the bill of costs being referred to another Deputy Registrar for taxation afresh in the presence of both parties.
Supplementary Affidavit. 4. The applicant filed a supplementary affidavit stating that the respondent’s bill of costs was assessed at Kshs 36,800/- and insisted that the amount was excessive. He referred to his replying affidavit to the said bill of costs before the taxing master.
Replying Affidavit. 5. The respondent, in his replying affidavit, annexed the full copy of the bill of costs and referred to his notice of objection written to the taxing master. He again urged the court to reassess the bill of costs.
Issue for Determination. 6. From the foregoing, the issue for determination is whether the application has merit.
Analysis and Determination. 7. When the application herein was filed, the court, on 03rd February 2025, granted leave to the applicant to file the same as a reference provided that the taxing master’s ruling is annexed thereto. On 05th March 2025, the applicant had not filed or served the reference but had filed a supplementary affidavit through which he annexed the taxing master’s ruling.
8. The orders sought arise from the ruling of the Deputy Registrar as taxing master delivered on 04th September 2024. Under Rule 10 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order (ARO), a Registrar or a Deputy Registrar of the High Court is a taxing officer for purposes of taxation of bills under the ARO.
9. A Judge of the High Court cannot therefore sit as a taxing master, neither can he assess or reassess the bill of costs. The correct position is that when a party contests assessment of the bill of costs, a reference is filed and is considered by the High Court. The only order that can be made by the High Court is one referring the matter back to the taxing master for re-assessment.
Disposition. 10. Through his grounds of opposition, the respondent stated that he is amenable to having the matter placed before a different taxing master for reassessment. However, the order sought cannot be granted in the manner that it is sought.
11. Given this position, the court hereby orders that the matter be referred back to a different taxing master for reassessment of the bill of costs dated 04th June 2024.
12. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU HIGH COURT THIS 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025. ___________________R. MWONGOJUDGEDelivered in the presence of:1. Ms. Mwinja holding brief for Mugambi N. for Applicants2. Kathungu for Respondent3. Francis Munyao - Court Assistant