[2024] KEELC 4234 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 4234 (KLR)

The court found that although no substantive appeal had been filed and no security for the money decree was offered, it was in the interests of justice to grant the applicant (1st defendant) a limited stay of execution to allow her to ventilate her issues at the Court of Appeal. The stay was granted for a period of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 4234 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Daniel Waithaka Njora; Defendant: Jacinta Nyawira Kingi; Defendant: Roysambu Housing Co-operative Society Ltd; Defendant: Commissioner Of Lands
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 759 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Stay of execution granted for 60 days; costs awarded to the respondent; file closed.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Money Decree, Security for Costs, Appeal Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Money Decree Security for Costs Appeal Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Waithaka Njora

Plaintiff

Jacinta Nyawira Kingi

Defendant

Roysambu Housing Co-operative Society Ltd

Defendant

Commissioner Of Lands

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of a substantive appeal and security for the money decree affects the grant of stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although no substantive appeal had been filed and no security for the money decree was offered, it was in the interests of justice to grant the applicant (1st defendant) a limited stay of execution to allow her to ventilate her issues at the Court of Appeal. The stay was granted for a period of 60 days from the date of the ruling, after which execution may proceed if no further orders are obtained. The applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

Stay of execution granted for 60 days; costs awarded to the respondent; file closed.

Orders

  • A stay of execution of the judgment is granted for a period of 60 days from 13 May 2024.
  • The applicant is condemned to pay costs of the application.