[2024] KEELC 13706 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's failure to attend the online hearing was due to circumstances beyond his control, specifically the provision of incorrect online credentials and the lack of a published cause list. Recognizing the challenges faced by unrepresented litigants in navigating online court systems, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 13706 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Samuel Muiruri Njuguna; Respondent: Daraja Capital Limited; Respondent: Peter Kabathi Kimani
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Thika
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E010 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Suit
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- JG Kemei
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Online Court Procedure, Restrictions on Land
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Samuel Muiruri Njuguna
Applicant
Daraja Capital Limited
Respondent
Peter Kabathi Kimani
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Reinstatement of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application to reinstate the suit dismissed for non-appearance should be allowed.
- 2 Whether the applicant's failure to attend court online constituted sufficient cause for reinstatement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's failure to attend the online hearing was due to circumstances beyond his control, specifically the provision of incorrect online credentials and the lack of a published cause list. Recognizing the challenges faced by unrepresented litigants in navigating online court systems, the court held that the interests of justice would be served by reinstating the dismissed applications. The court therefore allowed the application for reinstatement but declined to consider the substantive prayers relating to restrictions on the land and leave to appeal, as these would be addressed in the reinstated applications.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The applications dated 8/5/2024 and 28/7/2023 are reinstated for hearing.
- No orders as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Njuguna v Daraja Capital Limited & another (Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E010 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 13706 (KLR) (10 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13706 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Thika
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E010 of 2023
JG Kemei, J
December 10, 2024
Between
Samuel Muiruri Njuguna
Applicant
and
Daraja Capital Limited
1st Respondent
Peter Kabathi Kimani
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. Before the Court is the Application dated the 24/5/2024 seeking the following orders;a.The Court be pleased to reinstate this matter that as dismissed on 20/5/2024 for non-appearance.b.That the Court grant orders directing the Land Registrar Kiambu to place a restriction against any form of interference with the land parcel Lari/Kirenga/1953 as the same is a subject of interest before the Court.c.The 1st Respondent by himself or through her agents or servants and or any other person acting under his instigation or on her behalf from any form of interference with the suit land.d.That the Court be pleased to grant orders for institution of a fresh action by way of an appeal as per the provisions of Order 25 rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules following the unprofessional conduct and withdrawal of the previous appeal against the Judgement and all consequential orders granted in ELC 94 of 2018. e.The Court be pleased to allow the Applicant leave to file an appeal out of time.
2. The Application is premised on the grounds annexed thereto and the Supporting Affidavit of the Applicant deponed on 24/5/2024 where he stated that he was unable to appear in Court online because he had been given the wrong credentials for the Court and by the time he got the correct online log-in credentials his matter had been dismissed. He added that there was no cause list published for Environment and Land Court Thika on 20/5/2024 and it is not his fault that he was unable to attend Court online.
3. The Application was resisted by the 1st Respondent vide its Replying Affidavit filed by Peter Kimani Njinu who described himself as the director of the 1st Respondent with authority to swear the affidavit. The deponent gave a history of the multiple Applications filed by the Respondent to wit MCELC No 94 of 2018 which suit is pending in the lower Court at Kiambu and the Applicant has taken no steps to prosecute the same. Alongside the suit he filed an Application and sought injunctive orders restraining the Respondents from selling the suit land which Application was dismissed vide a Ruling dated the 10/5/2022. The decision has not been appealed since. That the Applications dated the 2/11/2023 and 8/5/2024 were dismissed for non-attendance. The 1st Respondent averred that the Applications are but an abuse of the process of the Court and should be dismissed.
4. On the 3/10/2024 parties took directions to file written submissions but by the time of writing the Ruling none had filed.
5. The key issue is whether the Applications dated the 2/1/11/2023 and 8/5/2024 ought to be reinstated.
6. Arising from the uncontroverted evidence of the Applicant, this Court is of the view that the online system can be a taunting experience for all Court users especially for the unrepresented litigants. The course of justice will be served if the Application is allowed effectively reinstating the Notices of Motion dated the 8/5/2024 and 28/7/2023 for hearing.
7. With respect I decline to consider prayers Nos. b – e as they form the gist of the applications which have been reinstated.
8. I make no orders as to costs.
9. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT THIKA THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS.J G KEMEIJUDGEDelivered online in the presence of;Applicant – James Muiruri representing Mr. Samuel M. NjugunaMs. Mwiiri for the 1st Respondent2nd Respondent – AbsentCourt Assistants – Phyllis