[2024] KEHC 13448 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 13448 (KLR)

The court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the orders sought by the applicant because the dispute related to land and fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as provided by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. As...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 13448 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Catherine Wandia Njuguna; Respondent: Lucy Wacu Aphael Limited; Respondent: Uokoaji Housing Co-operative Society Limited; Respondent: The Land Registrar, Kiambu; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E199 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Transfer and Withdrawal of Suit
Outcome
application struck out for want of jurisdiction
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Court, Transfer of Suit, Environment and Land Court Act, Original Jurisdiction, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Jurisdiction of Court Transfer of Suit Environment and Land Court Act Original Jurisdiction Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Wandia Njuguna

Applicant

Lucy Wacu Aphael Limited

Respondent

Uokoaji Housing Co-operative Society Limited

Respondent

The Land Registrar, Kiambu

Respondent

The Honourable Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Transfer and Withdrawal of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to transfer and withdraw a land dispute from the Chief Magistrate’s Environment and Land Court to another subordinate court.
  2. 2 Whether the orders sought by the applicant can be granted in light of the Environment and Land Court Act and the Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to grant the orders sought by the applicant because the dispute related to land and fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court as provided by Article 162(2) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act. As such, the High Court could not entertain the application for transfer and withdrawal of the suit from the Chief Magistrate’s Environment and Land Court to another subordinate court. The application was therefore struck out for want of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

application struck out for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion application dated 27th September, 2024 is struck out.
  • No orders as to costs.