[2025] KECPT 257 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 257 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn from the Sacco by issuing a written notice dated 29th July, 2022, followed by a demand letter from her advocates. The Respondent failed to provide evidence of a required standard format for withdrawal notice or any outstanding liabilities by the Claimant....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 257 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ruth Njambi Njuguna; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 993/E1007 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Rights, Share Refund, Voluntary Membership, By Laws Enforcement
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Rights Share Refund Voluntary Membership By Laws Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ruth Njambi Njuguna

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her share contributions upon withdrawal from the Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent breached its by-laws and statutory obligations by failing to refund the Claimant's deposits.
  3. 3 Whether the Claimant complied with the notice requirements for withdrawal under the Co-operative Societies Act and the Sacco's by-laws.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had properly withdrawn from the Sacco by issuing a written notice dated 29th July, 2022, followed by a demand letter from her advocates. The Respondent failed to provide evidence of a required standard format for withdrawal notice or any outstanding liabilities by the Claimant. The Tribunal held that the Claimant's right to her deposits is protected by the Sacco Societies Act, which mandates refund within sixty days of withdrawal notice. The Respondent's financial difficulties and AGM resolutions do not override statutory obligations to members. The Claimant's Statement of Account was undisputed, and the Respondent did not file a Statement of Account...

Court Disposition

claim allowed

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant for Kshs. 503,000/=
  • Respondent to pay interest at Tribunal rates from the date of filing the claim until payment in full.