[2025] KEELC 3670 (KLR)

[2025] KEELC 3670 (KLR)

The court found that the 2nd Defendant provided a reasonable explanation for his delay in filing the defence, namely his incarceration from 2021 to May 2023. Although no documentary evidence of incarceration was attached, the court noted that the record reflected his absence due to imprisonment and that production...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEELC 3670 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Teresia Wambui Njuguna; Defendant: Emma Wangari Wangui; Defendant: Joseph Kinyanjui Muthoni; Defendant: Joyce Muthoni Waithaka; Defendant: Thika District Land Registry; Defendant: Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 39 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Defence Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed; 2nd Defendant granted leave to file Defence, List of Documents and Witness Statements out of time.
Judges
JM Onyango
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right to Fair Hearing, Filing of Defence, Judicial Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Extension of Time Right to Fair Hearing Filing of Defence Judicial Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teresia Wambui Njuguna

Plaintiff

Emma Wangari Wangui

Defendant

Joseph Kinyanjui Muthoni

Defendant

Joyce Muthoni Waithaka

Defendant

Thika District Land Registry

Defendant

Kenya Commercial Bank Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Defence Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd Defendant should be granted leave to file his Defence, List of Documents and Witness Statements out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 2nd Defendant provided a reasonable explanation for his delay in filing the defence, namely his incarceration from 2021 to May 2023. Although no documentary evidence of incarceration was attached, the court noted that the record reflected his absence due to imprisonment and that production orders had been issued for his attendance. The court further observed that the matter had not proceeded to hearing and no serious prejudice would be occasioned to the parties by allowing the late filing. Exercising its discretion in the interest of justice, and guided by the principles in Order 50 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules, Article 50 and 159(2) of the Constitution,...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; 2nd Defendant granted leave to file Defence, List of Documents and Witness Statements out of time.

Orders

  • The 2nd Defendant shall file and serve his defence, List and bundle of documents and witness statements within 14 days, contained in a bound and paginated trial bundle.
  • The Plaintiff and 1st Defendant shall file their replies to the Defence, if any, together with any additional documents within 14 days after service.