[2018] KEHC 8516 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8516 (KLR)

The court found that, based on the preliminary consideration of the evidence and submissions, a limited scrutiny of election materials was necessary to ensure justice in the case. The court exercised its discretion under Section 82(1) of the Elections Act and Rule 29 of the Elections Petitions Rules to order a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 8516 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nkoidilao Ole Lankas; Applicant: Albert Kiplangat; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Nduku Kimeu Annahstacia; Respondent: Ledama Ole Kina
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Naivasha
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Election Petition 3 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Interlocutory Ruling on Scrutiny Application
Outcome
Limited scrutiny of election materials ordered.
Judges
CW Meoli
Legal Topics
Scrutiny of Election Materials, Validity of Election Results, Tallying and Transposition of Votes
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Constitutional Law Scrutiny of Election Materials Validity of Election Results Tallying and Transposition of Votes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nkoidilao Ole Lankas

Applicant

Albert Kiplangat

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Nduku Kimeu Annahstacia

Respondent

Ledama Ole Kina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Election Petition / Interlocutory Ruling on Scrutiny Application

  1. 1 Whether a limited scrutiny of election materials is warranted in the circumstances of the petition.
  2. 2 Whether the accuracy of the tallying and transposition of votes in the identified polling stations is in question.
  3. 3 Whether the scrutiny should be confined to documentary evidence and not physical ballots.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, based on the preliminary consideration of the evidence and submissions, a limited scrutiny of election materials was necessary to ensure justice in the case. The court exercised its discretion under Section 82(1) of the Elections Act and Rule 29 of the Elections Petitions Rules to order a scrutiny confined to the examination of the printed Register of Voters, original Forms 38A, 38B, 38C, and Candidate Vote Tally Sheets for the 130 polling stations identified in the petition. The scrutiny was to focus on the accuracy of entries, the number of registered voters, and the tallying and transposition of votes, without extending to the physical ballots. The court...

Court Disposition

Limited scrutiny of election materials ordered.

Orders

  • A limited scrutiny of the printed Register of Voters, original Forms 38A, 38B, 38C, and Candidate Vote Tally Sheets for the 130 polling stations listed in the petition is to be conducted.
  • The scrutiny will be supervised by the Deputy Registrar at Naivasha Law Courts between 5th and 9th February 2018, with a report to be filed and served by 12th February 2018.