[2024] KEHC 5864 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 5864 (KLR)

The court found that the application for review was filed promptly and that the appellant had demonstrated sufficient reason for varying the conditional stay orders, namely his inability to pay the decretal sum as a lump sum due to his financial circumstances. The court considered that no prejudice would be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 5864 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Joel Nkubitu; Respondent: Justus Memeu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E005 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Conditional Stay Orders Pending Appeal
Outcome
application allowed; conditional stay orders varied to permit installment payments; costs to appellant
Judges
EM Muriithi
Legal Topics
Review of Court Orders, Stay of Execution, Decretal Sum Deposit, Instalment Payments
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Review of Court Orders Stay of Execution Decretal Sum Deposit Instalment Payments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joel Nkubitu

Appellant

Justus Memeu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Conditional Stay Orders Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant has satisfied the requirements for review of the conditional stay orders pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant should be allowed to deposit the decretal sum in installments rather than as a lump sum.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for review was filed promptly and that the appellant had demonstrated sufficient reason for varying the conditional stay orders, namely his inability to pay the decretal sum as a lump sum due to his financial circumstances. The court considered that no prejudice would be occasioned to the respondent by allowing the appellant to deposit the decretal sum in installments, especially since the final installment would be paid by July 2024. In exercising its discretion under Order 45 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and guided by the overriding objectives of the Civil Procedure Act and the constitutional imperative to do substantive justice, the court...

Court Disposition

application allowed; conditional stay orders varied to permit installment payments; costs to appellant

Orders

  • The appellant shall deposit Ksh. 100,000 into the interest earning joint account forthwith.
  • The appellant shall deposit the balance of Ksh. 540,100 into the said account in five monthly installments (March – July 2024).