NM & ANOTHER [2009] KEHC 2281 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2281 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- KH Rawal
- Case number
- Adoption Cause 126 of 2005
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- KH Rawal
- Case number
- Adoption Cause 126 of 2005
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, including obtaining the necessary consents from the biological parents and extended family, and had been positively assessed by the Director of Children Services and the licensed adoption society. The applicants demonstrated a stable, loving environment and had bonded with the child, who had been in their care since infancy. The court was satisfied that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child, providing him with a permanent and supportive family structure. Accordingly, the court authorized the adoption and ordered that the child be known as KN, born on 9th August, 2002.
Court disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants are authorized to adopt the child, who shall be known as KN, born on 9th August, 2002.
- The orders shall be recorded in the Adoption register.
- The guardian ad litem is discharged.
02
Material facts
Parties
NM
ApplicantCKM
Applicant03
Procedural history
Posture
Adoption Application / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicants are fit and proper persons to adopt the child.
- 02
Whether all legal requirements for adoption under Kenyan law have been satisfied.
- 03
Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants have cared for the child since November 2002, have a stable marriage, are financially secure, and have bonded with the child. They have provided all necessary documentation and consents, and assessment reports confirm their suitability.
- Respondent
- There is no formal respondent; however, the Director of Children Services, the Adoption Society, and the guardian ad litem all support the adoption, confirming the applicants' fitness and the child's best interests.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Children Act, No. 8 of 2001, Section 4(2)
The best interests of the child are paramount in adoption proceedings.
- 02
Children Act, No. 8 of 2001, Sections 157, 158
Consent of biological parents and relevant authorities is required for adoption.
- 03
Children Act, No. 8 of 2001, Sections 156, 163
Assessment by Director of Children Services and a licensed adoption society is mandatory.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, including obtaining the necessary consents from the biological parents and extended family, and had been positively assessed by the Director of Children Services and the licensed adoption society. The applicants demonstrated a stable, loving environment and had bonded with the child, who had been in their care since infancy. The court was satisfied that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child, providing him with a permanent and supportive family structure. Accordingly, the court authorized the adoption and ordered that the child be known as KN, born on 9th August, 2002.
Obiter and limits
- Every child deserves to be raised in a perfect looking family set up.
- The confidence and happiness of the child before the court was notable and indicative of a positive environment.
Court disposition
adoption granted
- The applicants are authorized to adopt the child, who shall be known as KN, born on 9th August, 2002.
- The orders shall be recorded in the Adoption register.
- The guardian ad litem is discharged.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
NM AND
CKM ……………….. APPLICANTS
JUDGMENT
The Applicants were married on 11th December, 1999. They are born in 1970 and 1976 respectively.
There were unable to conceive and that is the reason they took over the care of the child since 1st November, 2002. But as the fortune had it, they gave birth to a male child on 16th February, 2004.
The 1st Applicant is a lecturer at[particulars withheld]and the 2nd Applicant is a business lady. Their bank statements are produced. Their background has been sufficiently depicted in the report dated 25th September, 2007 from the Director of Children Services. They are educated, religious and socially upright couple. They have steady loving marriage. They are also blessed with a son while they were fostering the child in question.
I must state here that I was very impressed with the confidence of the child when he came before me. He struck me as a very happy and smart child. I had thus to remove the child from the court as he was not aware of his background and he would have received a shock if he could have known from what was to be presented before the court. The child in my view, has bonded very well with the applicants.
As against that the child who was born on 9th August, 2002 is a taboo child born of an incestuous relation. Thus on the birth (after three days), the child was offered for adoption and both the father and mother consented to the offer and relinquished all the claims on the child. Similarly, father and mother of the child’s mother also gave their consent.
The Chief of [particulars withheld] witnessed those consents. Thereafter, the District Children Officer, Vihiga by a letter Ref.VHG/DCO/1BF/8/1/940/28 dated 12th August, 2002 referred the child to New Life Home, Kisumu on 12th August, 2002, and from there on 29th August, 2002 the child was transferred by Children Court Nairobi vide committal order P&C No.251 of 2005 dated 21st September, 2005 to the New Life Home, Nairobi. But the child was handed over under care and custody of the Applicants by the Home in November, 2002. Since that day the child is brought up by the Applicants.
The child is declared free for adoption on 9th March, 2006 vide certificate[ particulars withheld] of Little Angels Network, the Licensed Adoption Society under the Act.
The Director of the Children Services and the said Adoption Society have prepared and filed their detailed assessment reports which are carefully perused by me. In short the said reports state that the Applicants are fit and capable persons to look after the child who has bonded as their own son with them as well as with their biological son who is younger to him.
The Guardian ad litem also has filed a very detailed report on 24th April, 2005 and stated that “every child deserves to be raised in a perfect looking family set up, Dickens found that at Nzilus”
In view of the aforesaid, I am satisfied that the Applicants are capable and apt persons to be given the responsibility of the child.
I thus authorize them to adopt the child who shall be known as KN whose birth date is 9th August, 2002.
The orders be recorded in the Adoption register.
I discharge the guardian ad litem.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 17th day of July, 2009.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
17. 7.09
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.