[2017] KEELRC 1834 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1834 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent failed to establish a valid reason for the Claimant’s termination and did not afford her an opportunity to be heard, thus violating Sections 43 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The evidence did not support the Respondent’s claims of poor performance or absenteeism, as no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1834 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Noel Ingoka Selebwa; Respondent: Tracy Kavinda
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1102 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant; partial award granted.
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Procedural Fairness, Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal, House Allowance, Service Pay, Annual Leave
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Procedural Fairness Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal House Allowance Service Pay Annual Leave

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Noel Ingoka Selebwa

Claimant

Tracy Kavinda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant’s employment was lawful and fair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent failed to establish a valid reason for the Claimant’s termination and did not afford her an opportunity to be heard, thus violating Sections 43 and 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. The evidence did not support the Respondent’s claims of poor performance or absenteeism, as no warnings or disciplinary proceedings were substantiated. The Claimant was neither housed nor paid house allowance, contrary to Section 31 of the Act. Consequently, the termination was both substantively and procedurally unfair. The court awarded the Claimant compensation equivalent to four months’ salary, one month’s salary in lieu of notice, house allowance, annual leave, and...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant; partial award granted.

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 71,440 as compensation and statutory dues.
  • The amount shall attract interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.