[2016] KEHC 5090 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 5090 (KLR)

The court held that, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013, the power to grant a waiver of court fees in constitutional petitions is vested in the Registrar, not the court. The rules clearly provide that an application for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 5090 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Non-Aligned Leaders Council; Respondent: Office of the President & Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 6 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Court Fee Waiver, Public Interest Litigation, Access to Justice
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Court Fee Waiver Public Interest Litigation Access to Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Non-Aligned Leaders Council

Applicant

Office of the President & Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant a waiver of court fees in constitutional petitions.
  2. 2 Whether the application for waiver of court fees should be made to the Registrar as per the relevant rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013, the power to grant a waiver of court fees in constitutional petitions is vested in the Registrar, not the court. The rules clearly provide that an application for exemption from court fees must be made to the Registrar, who is empowered to consider and determine such applications. The court therefore lacks jurisdiction to entertain or grant the orders sought in the present application. As a result, the application for waiver of court fees was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application filed on 15th February, 2016 is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.