[2025] KEELC 4141 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient grounds for substituted service, having shown that the 1st defendant could not be traced despite reasonable efforts. The law requires that parties be made aware of proceedings against them, and where personal service is not possible, substituted service...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEELC 4141 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Abdul Aziz Noor; Defendant: William Mutai; Defendant: The Land Registrar Nandi; Defendant: The Director Land Administration; Defendant: The County Government Of Nandi
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Land Case E002 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Substituted Service, Service of Process, Land Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Aziz Noor
Plaintiff
William Mutai
Defendant
The Land Registrar Nandi
Defendant
The Director Land Administration
Defendant
The County Government Of Nandi
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be granted leave to serve the 1st defendant by substituted service through advertisement in a local daily.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated sufficient grounds for substituted service due to inability to trace the 1st defendant.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated sufficient grounds for substituted service, having shown that the 1st defendant could not be traced despite reasonable efforts. The law requires that parties be made aware of proceedings against them, and where personal service is not possible, substituted service is allowed. The court was satisfied that the application was meritorious and allowed it as prayed, permitting service of summons on the 1st defendant by advertisement in a local daily.
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the plaintiff to serve the 1st defendant by substituted service through advertisement in a local daily.
- Costs of the application shall be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
Noor v Mutai & 3 others (Land Case E002 of 2023) [2025] KEELC 4141 (KLR) (26 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEELC 4141 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kapsabet
Land Case E002 of 2023
GMA Ongondo, J
May 26, 2025
Between
Abdul Aziz Noor
Plaintiff
and
William Mutai
1st Defendant
The Land Registrar Nandi
2nd Defendant
The Director Land Admininistration
3rd Defendant
The County Government Of Nandi
4th Defendant
Ruling
1. In the Notice of Motion application dated 17th February 2025 originated under, inter alia, Order 5 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010 and sections 1A & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act Chapter 21 Laws of Kenya, the plaintiff/applicant, Abdul Aziz Noor through M/S Cheruiyot Melly and Company Advocates is seeking the orders infra;a.That the Honourable court be pleased to grant the plaintiffs leave to serve the 1st defendant/Respondent through substituted service by advertising the Summons in one of the local circulating dailies.b.That the costs of this application be in the cause.
2. The application is based upon the supporting affidavit of even date and eight grounds which include;a.That the plaintiff/applicant instituted this suit vide the plaint dated 13th of July 2023 on 17th Day of July 2023. b.That the plaintiff/applicant has been unable to effect service of the Summons and the pleadings aforesaid upon the 1st Defendant/Respondent who is unknown to him and his last place of residence also unknown to him.c.That the whereabouts of the 1st defendant is unknown to the plaintiff and efforts to trace him have proved futile.
3. The application is coming up for hearing today and Mr Victor Kiprono has implored the court to allow the same in terms of orders 1 and 2 sought therein.
4. In that regard, is the application meritorious?
5. It is established law that a party to a case must be made aware of it’s existence to enable that party to either respond to it or not; see Ogada-vs-Mollin (2009) eKLR.
6. Furthermore, it is trite law that for any reason where summons cannot be served in the ordinary way, personal service, a party can be served by way of substituted service; see Ephraim Njugu Njeru-vs-Justin Bedan Muturi and 2 others (2006) eKLR.
7. The grounds of the application and the supporting affidavit reveal that the plaintiff cannot trace the 1st defendant for service in the ordinary way.
8. In the circumstances, I find the application cogent, firm and merited.
9. A fortiori, the application dated 17th February 2025, be and is hereby allowed in terms of orders 1 and 2 sought therein as stated in paragraph 1 (a) and (b) hereinabove.
10. It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KAPSABET THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY 2025. G M A ONGONDOJUDGEPresent;Mr V. Kiprono learned counsel for the plaintiff/applicantWalter, court assistant