[2014] KEHC 2995 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2995 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to the release of the Kshs. 2,900,000/- deposited as security for stay pending appeal, as the defendants' appeal had been dismissed and there was no opposition to the application. The inability to trace the previous advocate and the loss of the original deposit slip...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 2995 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Noordin Fazlehusein Rajabali; Defendant: Kutubdin Akberali Khanbhai; Defendant: Husseinbhai Khanbhai; Defendant: Hatimi Joinery Works Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 190 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Release of Deposited Funds
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Release of Deposit, Stay of Execution, Change of Advocate, Court Orders Enforcement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Release of Deposit Stay of Execution Change of Advocate Court Orders Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Noordin Fazlehusein Rajabali

Plaintiff

Kutubdin Akberali Khanbhai

Defendant

Husseinbhai Khanbhai

Defendant

Hatimi Joinery Works Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Release of Deposited Funds

  1. 1 Whether the court should order the release of Kshs. 2,900,000/- deposited in Bank of India to the plaintiff's current advocate.
  2. 2 Whether the release can be effected without production of the original deposit slip due to its loss.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to the release of the Kshs. 2,900,000/- deposited as security for stay pending appeal, as the defendants' appeal had been dismissed and there was no opposition to the application. The inability to trace the previous advocate and the loss of the original deposit slip were not sufficient grounds to deny the plaintiff access to the funds. The court exercised its discretion to order Bank of India to release the funds, together with accrued interest, to the plaintiff's current advocate without requiring the original deposit slip. Costs of the application were awarded to the plaintiff as the successful party.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Bank of India is ordered to release to the firm of Kishore Nanji Advocate the amount of Kshs. 2,900,000/- deposited in respect of this matter in the joint names of A.Y.A. Jiwaji & Jiwaji and Aboo & Company and all accrued interest.
  • Bank of India shall release the said funds to the firm of Kishore Nanji Advocate without requiring the production of the deposit slip.