[2023] KEELRC 1434 (KLR)
The court found that the application was properly drawn and supported by affidavit, thus not incompetent or defective. The delay in complying with the condition for stay of execution (payment of Kshs 1,000,000) was explained to the court's satisfaction, as it was caused by the respondent’s advocate’s delay in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 1434 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Thomas Mugambi Nthiga; Respondent: County Government of Embu; Respondent: County Public Service Board Embu
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 15 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Application allowed; dismissal order set aside; notice of motion reinstated; each party to bear own costs.
- Judges
- ON Makau
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Application, Setting Aside Orders, Delay in Compliance, Stay of Execution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Mugambi Nthiga
Applicant
County Government of Embu
Respondent
County Public Service Board Embu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion to set aside the dismissal order is incompetent or bad in law.
- 2 Whether the application for reinstatement of the notice of motion has merit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application was properly drawn and supported by affidavit, thus not incompetent or defective. The delay in complying with the condition for stay of execution (payment of Kshs 1,000,000) was explained to the court's satisfaction, as it was caused by the respondent’s advocate’s delay in providing necessary bank details and IFM’s Number. Since the payment was eventually made and the facts were not rebutted by the petitioner, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the dismissal order and reinstate the notice of motion for hearing on its merits. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; dismissal order set aside; notice of motion reinstated; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- The order made on February 1, 2023 dismissing the notice of motion dated December 9, 2022 is set aside.
- The notice of motion dated December 9, 2022 is reinstated for hearing on merits.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Nthiga v County Government of Embu & another (Constitutional Petition 15 of 2017) [2023] KEELRC 1434 (KLR) (9 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELRC 1434 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nyeri
Constitutional Petition 15 of 2017
ON Makau, J
June 9, 2023
Between
Thomas Mugambi Nthiga
Petitioner
and
County Government of Embu
1st Applicant
County Public Service Board Embu
2nd Applicant
Ruling
1. This ruling relates to Respondent’s Notice of Motion dated February 10, 2023 seeking for:-a.Setting aside of order made on February 1, 2023 by which notice of motion dated December 9, 2023 was dismissed.b.Reinstatement of the Notice of Motion dated December 9, 2022 for hearing.c.Costs.
2. The motion is supported by an Affidavit sworn by Johnson Ngao Nyaga County Secretary Embu County Government. The main reason for the application is that the delay in paying the Kshs 1,000,000. 00 as a condition for stay is because the respondent’s Advocate delayed availing bank details and the IFM’s Number. It is therefore the applicants’ case that the delay was not deliberate. It was further contended that the application has been made without undue delay.
3. The petitioner has not challenged the facts but has filed grounds of opposition contending that the application is incompetent bad in law and an abuse of the process of court. Further that the application lacks merits.
4. The applicant filed submissions but the petitioner relied on his grounds of opposition.
5. The issues for determination are:-a.Whether the motion is incompetent, and bad in law.b.Whether the application has merits.
6. As regards the alleged incompetence or defect in the motion, I regret to say that I saw no such defect or incompetence. The motion is drawn to the correct form and it is supported by an affidavit. Consequently, I find and hold that the application is proper in law.
7. As regards its merits, the facts presented by the applicant have not been rebutted. There is evidence that despite delays the Kshs 1,000,000. 00 was paid to the petition as a condition for stay of execution. The delay has been explained to the satisfaction of the court and therefore I allow the application herein in the following terms:-i.The order made on February 1, 2023 dismissing the notice of motion dated December 9, 2022 is hereby set aside.ii.The Notice of Motion dated December 9, 2022 is hereby reinstated for hearing on merits.iii.Each party to bear own costs of the application.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NYERI THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023. ONESMUS N MAKAUJUDGEORDERIn view of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the Covid-19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15th April 2020, this ruling has been delivered to the parties online with their consent, the parties having waived compliance with Rule 28(3) of the ELRC Procedure Rules which requires that all judgments and rulings shall be dated, signed and delivered in the open court.ONESMUS N MAKAUJUDGE