[2023] KEELRC 1554 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1554 (KLR)

The court found that although there was a delay in filing the appeal, the delay was not unreasonably long and the applicant provided a reasonable explanation for it, namely, the late receipt of the typed proceedings and ruling. The court further determined that the intended appeal raised arguable grounds. In...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1554 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Francis Ngati Nthokoi; Respondent: Fuel Net Company Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Employment and Labour Relations Cause E122 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed; applicant granted leave to file appeal out of time.
Judges
AN Mwaure
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Delay in Filing, Access to Justice
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Extension of Time Right of Appeal Delay in Filing Access to Justice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Ngati Nthokoi

Applicant

Fuel Net Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant extension of time to appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the intended appeal is arguable.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although there was a delay in filing the appeal, the delay was not unreasonably long and the applicant provided a reasonable explanation for it, namely, the late receipt of the typed proceedings and ruling. The court further determined that the intended appeal raised arguable grounds. In balancing the interests of justice and the right to be heard, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application for extension of time, emphasizing that justice should be availed to all parties and that technicalities should not hinder access to justice. The court also noted that the further delay of one and a half months was not excessive and could be overlooked in the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; applicant granted leave to file appeal out of time.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file the appeal and the memorandum of appeal within 7 days from the date of the ruling.
  • The costs of the application shall be in the intended appeal.