[2024] KEHC 5546 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 5546 (KLR)

The court held that, in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Court of Appeal's decision in Bethwel Wilson Kibor vs Republic [2009] eKLR, the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing must be considered in the computation of his sentence. Since the applicant was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 5546 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Erick Mwenda Ntoribi; Respondent: Director Of Public Prosecutions
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E237 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Outcome
Application allowed. The applicant's sentence to be computed from the date of arrest.
Judges
TW Cherere
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Custodial Remand Credit, Sexual Offences, Defilement, Sentence Computation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Custodial Remand Credit Sexual Offences Defilement Sentence Computation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erick Mwenda Ntoribi

Applicant

Director Of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Sentence Computation Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody prior to sentencing considered in the computation of his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that, in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the Court of Appeal's decision in Bethwel Wilson Kibor vs Republic [2009] eKLR, the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing must be considered in the computation of his sentence. Since the applicant was arrested on 26th May, 2015 and remained in custody throughout the trial until his sentencing on 12th June, 2017, the 20-year imprisonment term imposed on him must be computed from the date of his arrest. This ensures compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements regarding fair sentencing and the right to have pre-sentence custody taken into account.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. The applicant's sentence to be computed from the date of arrest.

Orders

  • The 20 years imprisonment term imposed on the applicant shall be computed from 26th May, 2015 when he was arrested.