[2020] KECA 216 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 216 (KLR)

The court determined that since the facts and reasons for delay in this application are identical to those in Civil Application No. 180 of 2020, and the same legal principles apply, the ruling given in that application should apply to the present application mutatis mutandis. The court thus did not provide a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 216 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Nubian Rights Forum; Respondent: Kenya Human Rights Commission; Respondent: Kenya National Commission on Human Rights; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney-General; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government; Respondent: The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government; Respondent: The Director National Registration; Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Information, Communication & Technology; Respondent: The Speaker, National Assembly; Respondent: Kenya Law Reform Commission; Respondent: Child Welfare Society; Respondent: Ajibika Society; Respondent: Muslims for Human Rights Initiative; Respondent: Haki Centre; Respondent: Law Society of Kenya; Respondent: Inform Action; Respondent: Bunge La Mwananchi; Respondent: International Policy Group; Respondent: Terror Victims Support Initiative
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 185 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application disposed of by applying the ruling in Civil Application No. 180 of 2020 mutatis mutandis.
Judges
J Karanja
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Court of Appeal Rules, Procedural Delay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Extension of Time Appeals Out of Time Court of Appeal Rules Procedural Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nubian Rights Forum

Applicant

Kenya Human Rights Commission

Respondent

Kenya National Commission on Human Rights

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney-General

Respondent

The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government

Respondent

The Principal Secretary, Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government

Respondent

The Director National Registration

Respondent

The Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Information, Communication & Technology

Respondent

The Speaker, National Assembly

Respondent

Kenya Law Reform Commission

Respondent

Child Welfare Society

Respondent

Ajibika Society

Respondent

Muslims for Human Rights Initiative

Respondent

Haki Centre

Respondent

Law Society of Kenya

Respondent

Inform Action

Respondent

Bunge La Mwananchi

Respondent

International Policy Group

Respondent

Terror Victims Support Initiative

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the application meets the requirements under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules for extension of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that since the facts and reasons for delay in this application are identical to those in Civil Application No. 180 of 2020, and the same legal principles apply, the ruling given in that application should apply to the present application mutatis mutandis. The court thus did not provide a separate analysis but adopted its earlier reasoning and decision, effectively disposing of the application on the same grounds.

Court Disposition

Application disposed of by applying the ruling in Civil Application No. 180 of 2020 mutatis mutandis.

Orders

  • The ruling in Civil Application No. 180 of 2020 applies mutatis mutandis to this application.