[2025] KECA 633 (KLR)

[2025] KECA 633 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing his appeal, namely, the late availability of typed and certified proceedings and judgment from the High Court. Given that the applicant faces the death penalty, the Court held that it is just and fair to allow him to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECA 633 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Victor Nyariki Nyabaru; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Application E028 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
LK Kimaru
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Robbery With Violence, Conviction Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Right of Appeal Robbery With Violence Conviction Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victor Nyariki Nyabaru

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal against conviction and sentence for robbery with violence.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing his appeal, namely, the late availability of typed and certified proceedings and judgment from the High Court. Given that the applicant faces the death penalty, the Court held that it is just and fair to allow him to exercise his right of second appeal. The absence of opposition from the respondent further supported the grant of the application. Accordingly, the Court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2022, to allow the application and grant leave to appeal out of time.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to appeal out of time.
  • The notice of appeal shall be filed and served within fourteen (14) days of the date of this ruling.