[2023] KEELC 18678 (KLR)
The court found that there was no evidence that Ms. Ochwal had ever represented the interested party or had any interaction with him in the matter in question. The letter relied upon by the interested party was from 2003, at which time Ms. Ochwal was neither a member nor a partner in the firm, and her name did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 18678 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Matoke Nyabero; Respondent: The Land Registrar Nyamira County; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar; Interested Party: Patroba Onserio Mikae
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E004 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Disqualify Advocate
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- JM Kamau
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Conflict of Interest, Disqualification of Counsel, Representation Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matoke Nyabero
Applicant
The Land Registrar Nyamira County
Respondent
The Chief Land Registrar
Respondent
Patroba Onserio Mikae
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Disqualify Advocate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms. Winny Adhiambo Ochwal, Advocate, should be disqualified from representing the applicant due to alleged prior representation of the interested party in the same subject matter.
- 2 Whether there exists a conflict of interest arising from the advocate's previous association with the interested party.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was no evidence that Ms. Ochwal had ever represented the interested party or had any interaction with him in the matter in question. The letter relied upon by the interested party was from 2003, at which time Ms. Ochwal was neither a member nor a partner in the firm, and her name did not appear on the letterhead. The firm had undergone changes in structure and partnership since then. The interested party failed to show that the matter ever went to court or that Ms. Ochwal had access to any confidential information. Consequently, the court held that there was no conflict of interest and no basis for disqualifying Ms. Ochwal from representing the applicant.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 21/3/2023 seeking to disqualify Ms. Winny Adhiambo Ochwal from acting for the applicant is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Nyabero v Land Registrar Nyamira County & another; Mikae (Interested Party) (Miscellaneous Civil Application E004 of 2023) [2023] KEELC 18678 (KLR) (12 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 18678 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Miscellaneous Civil Application E004 of 2023
JM Kamau, J
July 12, 2023
Between
Matoke Nyabero
Plaintiff
and
The Land Registrar Nyamira County
1st Respondent
The Chief Land Registrar
2nd Respondent
and
Patroba Onserio Mikae
Interested Party
Ruling
1. The interested party herein has vide Notice of Motion dated 21/3/2023 urged the court to bar Ms. Winny Adhiambo Ochwal, Advocate from acting for the applicant herein Matoke Nyabero on the ground that he had instructed the said Advocate to represent him in presenting, drafting pleading “in this case which was the same subject matter and same parties”. He prays that “the said firm of Advocate for the applicant should be disqualified”. The Application is supported by the Interested party’s Supporting Affidavit sworn on 21/3/2023 and filed in court on 22/2/2023.
2. In the said Affidavit, the Interested Party depones that the firm of Oguttu – Mboya & co. Advocates where Ms. Ochwal is a partner “where once my Advocate who were representing in this case over same subject matter”. He says he is surprised that the firm he had engaged in land parcel No. North Mugirango/Boisanga 1/934 is representing the adverse party and prays that this court strikes out all the pleadings drafted in this case by the firm of Oguttu-Mboya & Co. Advocates. The Interested Party has attached a copy of letter dated 6/2/2003 referring to the said parcel of land North Mugirango/Boisanga 1/934 with Patroba Onterio Mikayi as the client. Ms. Winnie Adhiambo Ochwal Advocate responded vide a Replying Affidavit sworn on 23/3/2023 and filed in court on 24/3/2023 by deponing that the firm of Oguttu Mboya & Co. Advocates was until the year 2017 a sole proprietorship owned and managed by one Mr. Joseph Mboya Oguttu who is now a Judge of the Environment and Land court. It was then dissolved and a new partnership was formed in the year 2019 operating in the name and style of M/s. Oguttu, Ochwangi, Ochwal & co. Advocates until December 2020 and is now Ms. Oguttu, Mboya, Ochwal & Partners Advocates.
3. The Advocate said that she never interacted with the Interested Party in 2003 when she was not even in the said firm of M/s. Oguttu Mboya & co. Advocates. The letter dated 6/2/2003 from the above firm which the Interested Party relies upon has the letterhead showing J. Oguttu Mboya LLB(Hon) Nbi. Dip KSL and Justus W.O. Otiso Llb (Hons) LLM(Notts) Dip. (KSL) as the only Advocates in the firm and Ms. Ochwal is not one of them.
4. The interested party does not even show in his papers that the matter ever went to court and if so when and where or what was the case number. Ms. Ochwal says that she resigned from the State Law Office at Kisii in 2017 and could not have interacted with the Interested party.
5. I therefore find that there is no conflict in Ms Ochwal representing the ex parte applicant against the interested party in this case and therefore dismiss the Application dated 21/3/2023 with costs.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NYAMIRA THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY 2023. MUGO KAMAUJUDGEIn the Presence of: -The Interested PartyMs. Ocwal for the Ex-parte ApplicantC/A – Kennedy