[2023] KEHC 99 (KLR)
The court held that since the certificate of costs dated February 4, 2022, had not been set aside or varied, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as provided under paragraph 51(2) of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The court further determined that interest at court rates would accrue from...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 99 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jones Nyachiro t/a M/S Nyachiro Nyagaka Co Advocates; Respondent: County Government Of Nyamira
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Case E004 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certificate of Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs, with interest and costs of the application.
- Judges
- FA Ochieng
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Remuneration, Taxation of Costs, Certificate of Costs, Judgment on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jones Nyachiro t/a M/S Nyachiro Nyagaka Co Advocates
Applicant
County Government Of Nyamira
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certificate of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of costs.
- 2 Whether interest should accrue on the taxed sum from 30 days after the date of the taxing officer's ruling.
- 3 Whether the respondent should pay the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the certificate of costs dated February 4, 2022, had not been set aside or varied, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as provided under paragraph 51(2) of the Advocates Remuneration Order. The court further determined that interest at court rates would accrue from March 5, 2022, being 30 days after the date of the taxing officer's ruling, as the respondent was aware of the ruling by February 18, 2022. The respondent was also ordered to pay the costs of the application. The absence of opposition from the respondent and the clear statutory framework led to the grant of the orders sought by the applicant.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for the taxed costs, with interest and costs of the application.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant for Kshs 1,507,962.50 as per the certificate of costs dated February 4, 2022.
- The sum shall attract interest at court rates from March 5, 2022 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Nyachiro t/a M/S Nyachiro Nyagaka Co Advocates v County Government of Nyamira (Miscellaneous Civil Case E004 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 99 (KLR) (18 January 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 99 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nyamira
Miscellaneous Civil Case E004 of 2022
FA Ochieng, J
January 18, 2023
Between
Jones Nyachiro t/a M/S Nyachiro Nyagaka Co Advocates
Applicant
and
The County Government Of Nyamira
Respondent
Ruling
1. The application dated April 20, 2022 was brought by Jones Nyachiro, trading as Nyachiro Nyagaka & Company Advocates (who shall hereinafter be cited as “the advocate”.
2. It is an application pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 51(2) of the Advocates Remuneration Order.
3. The application is premised upon certificate of costs dated February 4, 2022. Pursuant to the said certificate of costs, the learned taxing officer had awarded to the advocate the sum of Kshs 1,507,962. 50.
4. The certificate of costs had neither been set aside nor varied.
5. Accordingly, the advocate is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs, and I do hereby enter judgment for the said sum.
6. The said sum will attract interest at court rates from March 5, 2022, which is a date that is 30 days from the date when the taxing officer delivered his ruling.
7. I have calculated the 30 days’ grace period from the February 4, 2022 because it is evident from the letter written on February 18, 2022, that the respondent was aware of the ruling on taxation, that was delivered on February 4, 2022.
8. Finally, the respondent will pay to the applicant, costs of the application.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023. FRED A. OCHIENGJUDGEI certify that this is a true copy of the originalDEPUTY REGISTRAR