[2019] KEELC 1271 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated a prima facie case for the preservation of the suit property, as the 1st respondent was actively seeking to sell the land and had brought potential buyers to inspect it. The risk of alienation of the property before the determination of the petition justified the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 1271 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nyaga Muchiri; Applicant: Purity Mwathoko; Respondent: Thomas Njiru Kanyunga; Respondent: Micheru Kanyunga; Respondent: District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Meru South; Respondent: Land Registrar, Meru South; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The Honourable Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 4 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interim Application for Inhibition
- Outcome
- Interim order of inhibition granted; application not certified urgent; matter set for inter partes hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Inhibition Orders, Land Title Disputes, Interim Relief, Protection of Property Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nyaga Muchiri
Applicant
Purity Mwathoko
Applicant
Thomas Njiru Kanyunga
Respondent
Micheru Kanyunga
Respondent
District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Meru South
Respondent
Land Registrar, Meru South
Respondent
Chief Land Registrar
Respondent
The Honourable Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interim Application for Inhibition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim order of inhibition should issue to restrain registration of dealings in LR. No. Mwimbi/N. Mugumango/594 pending hearing and determination of the petition.
- 2 Whether the application meets the threshold for grant of interim relief to preserve the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated a prima facie case for the preservation of the suit property, as the 1st respondent was actively seeking to sell the land and had brought potential buyers to inspect it. The risk of alienation of the property before the determination of the petition justified the issuance of an interim order of inhibition. The court noted that granting the order would not prejudice any party, as it merely preserved the status quo pending inter partes hearing. However, the court declined to certify the application as urgent due to the non-attendance of the applicants and their advocate at the ex parte hearing. The court directed that the application be...
Court Disposition
Interim order of inhibition granted; application not certified urgent; matter set for inter partes hearing.
Orders
- Prayer 2 in the application dated 9th October, 2019 is granted: interim order of inhibition restraining registration of dealings in LR. No. Mwimbi/N. Mugumango/594 pending inter partes hearing.
- Application is not certified urgent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
51 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC PETITION CASE NO. 04 OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF LAND PARCEL NO. MWIMBI/MUGUMANGO/594
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 40 AND 165 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010
BETWEEN
NYAGA MUCHIRI........................................................................1ST PETITIONER
PURITY MWATHOKO...............................................................2ND PETITIONER
VERSUS
THOMAS NJIRU KANYUNGA.................................................1ST RESPONDENT
MICHERU KANYUNGA.............................................................2ND RESPONDENT
DISTRICT LAND ADJUDICATION & SETTLEMENT
OFFICER MERU SOUTH............................................................3RD RESPONDENT
LAND REGISTRAR, MERU SOUTH........................................4TH RESPONDENT
CHIEF LAND REGISTRAR........................................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL........................6TH RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The application states that it has been brought to court pursuant to Rules 23 and 24 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013 and Section 68 of the Land Registration Act. The application seeks the following orders:-
1. That the application be certified urgent.
2. That an interim order of inhibition do issue restraining the registration of dealings in LR. No. Mwimbi/N. Mugumango/594 pending the interpartes hearing of this application.
3. That an order of inhibition do issue restraining the registration of dealing in L.R. No .Mwimbi/N. Mugumango pending the hearing and determination of
4. That costs of this application be provided for.
2. The application has the following grounds:
1. That the 1st petitioner is the registered as the owner of Mwimbi/N. Mugumango/594.
2. That the said parcel of land is the subject of these proceedings
3. That the 1st respondent has put out the suit land for sale and various potential buyers have visited the same for inspection.
4. That unless dealings in respect of the suit land are inhibited, the 1st respondent will move the suit land further from the reach of the petitioners.
5. That the purpose of this application is to preserve the suit land pending the determination of the issues at variance between the parties herein.
3. The application is supported by the affidavit of Nyaga Muchiri the 1st petitioner, which states:-
I, NYAGA MUCHIRI an adult male of sound mind and of C/O P. O. Box 2913, Meru do hereby make oath and state as follows:-
1. That I am the 1st petitioner herein properly versed with all the issues stated herein.
2. That I have the authority of my co-petitioner to make and swear this affidavit.
3. That the subject matter of this petition is L.R.No. Mwimbi/N. Mugumango/594 which is registered in my names. (Annexed herein and marked “NM1” is a copy of a certificate of official search in respect of the said parcel of land).
4. That the 1st respondent is soliciting for buyers of the suit property and has brought several potential purchasers to inspect the same.
5. That I am apprehensive that the 1st respondent shall deal with the suit property in a manner that shall jeopardize the proper litigation of this petition.
6. ….
7. That it is in the interest of justice and fairness that these orders are sought.
8. That I depose to the foregoing believing the same to be true to the best of my knowledge, belief and understanding.
4. When the matter was slated to be heard exparte on 16th October, 2019, the applicants and their advocate were not in court. Having perused the certificate of urgency and the Notice of Motion application, both dated 9th October, 2019, I find that granting prayer 2 in the application will not prejudice any of the parties. In the circumstances, it is ordered as follows:-
a) Prayer 2 in the application dated 9th October, 2019 is granted.
b) For non-attendance in court by the petitioners and their advocate, this application is NOT certified urgent.
c) The petitioners are directed to properly serve the application upon the respondents.
d) The application will be heard interpartes on 30th October, 2019.
e) Costs shall be in the cause.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 16th day of October, 2019 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Petitioners and their advocate absent
P. M. NJOROGE,
JUDGE.