[2007] KEHC 3519 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 3519 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to prove that the respondents had committed any acts in breach of the court order to maintain the status quo. The only evidence presented, a mutation form dated 23/11/2006, related to events prior to the relevant order and did not establish any violation. There was no proof...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 3519 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Nyaga Muriuki; Defendant: Wariimi Gateri; Defendant: Njuki Gateri; Defendant: Njeru Gateri
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 115 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Committal for Contempt
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunctive Relief, Status Quo Orders, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Contempt of Court Injunctive Relief Status Quo Orders Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nyaga Muriuki

Plaintiff

Wariimi Gateri

Defendant

Njuki Gateri

Defendant

Njeru Gateri

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Committal for Contempt

  1. 1 Whether the respondents breached the court order to maintain the status quo regarding parcel No. Gaturi/Nembure/3737.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant proved acts of contempt by the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to prove that the respondents had committed any acts in breach of the court order to maintain the status quo. The only evidence presented, a mutation form dated 23/11/2006, related to events prior to the relevant order and did not establish any violation. There was no proof that the respondents had cut down coffee trees, dug terraces or trenches, or damaged crops after the order was made. As such, the court held that there was no contempt of court and dismissed the application for committal to civil jail.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 8/6/2007 is dismissed.