[2024] KEHC 3567 (KLR)
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for murder is unconstitutional and courts must exercise discretion in sentencing. The court considered the gravity and brutality of the offence, the trauma caused to the victim's family, and the individual...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 3567 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dickson Nyaga; Applicant: Jason Muriira; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 98 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Ruling
- Outcome
- petitioners resentenced to determinate terms of imprisonment
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Death Sentence, Resentencing, Murder Conviction, Constitutional Rights, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dickson Nyaga
Applicant
Jason Muriira
Applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Resentencing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for murder under Section 204 of the Penal Code is unconstitutional following the Supreme Court decision in Muruatetu.
- 2 Whether the petitioners are entitled to resentencing based on the circumstances of their case.
- 3 What is the appropriate sentence for each petitioner given the facts and mitigation presented.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for murder is unconstitutional and courts must exercise discretion in sentencing. The court considered the gravity and brutality of the offence, the trauma caused to the victim's family, and the individual circumstances of each petitioner. The 1st petitioner demonstrated remorse and efforts at rehabilitation, while the 2nd petitioner, who was the deceased's step-brother and led the attack, did not. The court concluded that a determinate sentence, rather than life imprisonment or death, would serve justice without confining the petitioners to hopelessness. Accordingly, the 1st petitioner...
Court Disposition
petitioners resentenced to determinate terms of imprisonment
Orders
- Dickson Nyaga is resentenced to serve 20 years from the date of his conviction on 22nd January, 2015.
- Jason Muriira is resentenced to serve 30 years from the date of his conviction on 22nd January, 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
Nyaga & another v Director of Public Prosecutions (Petition 98 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 3567 (KLR) (21 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 3567 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Meru
Petition 98 of 2023
TW Cherere, J
March 21, 2024
Between
Dickson Nyaga
1st Petitioner
Jason Muriira
2nd Petitioner
and
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Ruling
1. Petitioners were charged with murder in Meru Criminal Case No. 15 of 2011. They were both convicted and sentenced to suffer death. Their appeal to the Court of Appeal vide Criminal Appeal No. 32 of 2015 was dismissed.
2. Petitioners seek resentence following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & 5 Others –Vs-Republic, Petition No. 5 of 2015 (2017) eKLR where the said superior court held that the mandatory death sentence for the offence of murder as provided in Section 204 of the Penal Code is unconstitutional as it deprives courts of their inherent jurisdiction not to impose a death sentence in an appropriate case.
3. Petitioners plead for leniency on the ground that having served 9 years imprisonment, they have reflected on their actions and regret them. The 1st Petitioner has undertaken training as a means of reformation as demonstrated by numerous certificates but the second Petitioner has not.
4. The Respondent through Ms. Rita learned counsel opposed the application on the grounds the Petitioners who were armed with a gun harassed and robbed the deceased’s family subsequent to which they killed the deceased.
5. I have considered the petition and the opposition on behalf of the DPP. the victim was gagged with a seat belt over the mouth at the back of neck, the tongue was compressed backwards by the gag, he had a deep occipital cut 7 cm long and another on the nostrils and had died of massive subdural subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage. No doubt the victim died a very painful death.
6. Additionally, Jason Muriira, the 2nd Petitioner who was step-brother of the deceased who had previously threatened deceased with death led the attack on deceased’s family, harassed and threatened them with harm, robbed them and then abducted the Deceased from his family, in his vehicle, after which they killed him and dumped his body in a dump site. Petitioners were armed with a firearm during the incident.
7. No doubt the events of that day will traumatize the family of the Deceased for a long time.
8. In the South African case of S v Scott-Crossley 2008 (1) SACR 223 (SCA) at para 35 set out the purpose behind a sentence as follows:‘Plainly any sentence imposed must have deterrent and retributive force. But of course one must not sacrifice an accused person on the altar of deterrence. Whilst deterrence and retribution are legitimate elements of punishments, they are not the only ones, or for that matter, even the over-riding ones. . . [i]t is true that it is in the interests of justice that crime should be punished. However, punishment that is excessive serves neither the interests of justice nor those of society.”
9. Flowing from the foregoing, I find that it would not serve any meaningful purpose to confine Petitioners to a life of hopelessness. I am therefore persuaded to resentence Petitioners to a determinate sentence.
10. In the end, Dickson Nyaga is resentenced to serve 20 (twenty) years from the date of his conviction on 22nd January, 2015.
11. Jason Muriira on the other hand is resentenced to serve 30 (thirty) years from the date of his conviction on 22nd January, 2015.
DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024WAMAE. T. W. CHEREREJUDGEAppearancesCourt Assistants - Kinoti/Munene1st Petitioner - Present in person2nd Petitioner - Present in personFor DPP - Ms. Rita (PC- 1)