[2025] KEHC 5100 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 5100 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was convicted on his own plea of guilty for threatening to kill and creating a disturbance, and that the trial court's sentence of one year imprisonment was lawful. The Sentence Review Report filed by the Probation Officer did not recommend a non-custodial sentence. In the absence...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 5100 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samuel Geke Nyakundi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Revision Case E041 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Review
Outcome
application for sentence revision dismissed; custodial sentence upheld
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Threats to Kill, Breach of Peace, Sentencing Review, Plea of Guilty
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Threats to Kill Breach of Peace Sentencing Review Plea of Guilty

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samuel Geke Nyakundi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a revision of his custodial sentence for threatening to kill and creating a disturbance.
  2. 2 Whether the Sentence Review Report supports a non-custodial sentence for the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was convicted on his own plea of guilty for threatening to kill and creating a disturbance, and that the trial court's sentence of one year imprisonment was lawful. The Sentence Review Report filed by the Probation Officer did not recommend a non-custodial sentence. In the absence of any compelling reason or recommendation for a non-custodial sentence, the court held that there was no basis to interfere with the custodial sentence imposed by the trial court. The applicant was therefore directed to serve the remainder of his sentence in custody.

Court Disposition

application for sentence revision dismissed; custodial sentence upheld

Orders

  • The applicant shall continue to serve the remaining part of his sentence in custody.